64 Comments
User's avatar
Mysterysurf's avatar

Oh, FFS.

๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜

๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ.-๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜‰๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ, ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜น ๐˜”๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜–๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ, ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ข ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ.

Congressman-elect Brian Poindexter, a Democrat who recently defeated embattled Rep. Max Miller (R) in a heated House race in Ohio, is under investigation for alleged sexual harassment.

While full details of the allegation were not immediately made public, according to a Poindexter aide who was granted anonymity to discuss the investigation, the alleged harassment involved what Poindexter โ€œthought was an innocuous compliment to a volunteer.โ€

โ€œHe heard later that it made her feel uncomfortable and he felt awful,โ€ the aide said, adding that the campaign hired a human resources firm to look into the matter.

Two PACs that supported Poindexterโ€™s candidacy, the Blue Dog PAC and the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, said they became aware of a report of alleged sexual harassment in the final days of Poindexterโ€™s campaign and informed the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the arm of the Democratic Party that works to elect House candidates. The PACs also dropped their endorsements of Poindexter, though neither said why at the time.

According to the PACs, they did not explain the change in endorsement because the individual who made the allegation requested that no details be disclosed publicly, and she โ€œdid not want her identity becoming public and she wanted an opportunity to determine how she wanted to proceed while protecting herself.โ€

The DCCC, in a statement to The Washington Post, said it hired an independent, third-party firm to investigate Poindexter โ€” who wonโ€™t be sworn in as a congressman until January. (Washington Post)

Garbageman's avatar

'Chris Van Hollen is on Team Fight, and weโ€™re for Team Fight. Now try to be civil about this, all of you filthy fuckaducks in the comments.'

Remember this old saying in politics? 'In a close victory, the winners celebrate; in a lopsided victory, they fight over the spoils' . . .

And it looks like that's what's happening here . . .

I still say it will be Schumer and Jeffries leading the Democrats (at least for now) whether we like it or not . . . so go ahead and pour hate on me! ๐Ÿฅธ

Teen Laqueefa's avatar

Our popular Kansas (D) governor Kelly had endorsed a different candidate and then Holscher won the nomination, word on the street is they couldn't stand each other for reasons. Anyway, the citizens didn't care and chose Holscher anyway.

Shocktreatment's avatar

Sick of it...

No, me neither.

"I'm ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ with it" doesn't work much better than "I'm ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฌ with it". Maybe ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜น๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ or ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ in it...

How about "I am ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ in it." In the ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ sense?

2Cats2Furious's avatar

Dok gave us Nice Times AND a puppy!! I always say that Dok loves us best.

Edith Prickly's avatar

Van Hollen went to CECOT and refused to leave until they let him see Kilmar Abrego Garcia. That looks like leadership to me.

dave's avatar

The leadership positions go to whoever raised the most money from the big donors. That's their reward.

Our_Man_In_Redneckistan's avatar

I gotta stop you right there, Dok. Itโ€™s not necessarily the case that our side won.

Itโ€™s that those other bastards lost. And itโ€™s not real until the Members are seated.

William Donnell's avatar

TAE KWON DODO! You'll get this mellon when you pry it out of my cold dead...mellon holder.

Always Be Ithacating's avatar

Thinking positively, I would be so proud to vote for a party that knows planting shit like this is pathetic and exasperating: "Inside the Capitol, some Senate Democrats privately worry itโ€™s exactly the wrong time to have a messy leadership fight, according to several people granted anonymity to describe private conversations."

Aquaman, Real Estate Investor.'s avatar

Are those Democrats anyone outside of Chucks office? Can't be Fetterman either.

Tasner Hasenpfeffer's avatar

Me, I think it's exactly the right time for a healthy and vigorous debate about the direction of our country.

2Cats2Furious's avatar

You show โ€˜em, Lewis!

Edith Prickly's avatar

Thereโ€™s a clip of Secretary Pete talking about the situation that is reminding everyone what it was like when grownups were in charge. Weโ€™ll never get the truth out of those two bozos.

42tontom's avatar

OH THE CATMANITY

josephebacon's avatar

I guess his hand is gonna show yet another bruise...

Donald Trump has not be seen in public since Wednesday, and he hasn't uttered a single word about yesterday's historic air travel ground stop -- not even on his Truth Social page

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3n2bx2zitvs2f

Aquaman, Real Estate Investor.'s avatar

The champagne in the fridge isn't going to get any colder.

Hurry up!

R. Riddle's avatar

He's busy fixing the Super Intelligences with his Big Beautiful Brain.

Linda1961 aka Pollyanna's avatar

Dumb question - is the plus 1 in the 50% plus 1 1% (in which case, why not say 51%?), or 1 vote (why not say so?), or .1 (in which case, why not say 50.1%)? I had thought that as long as a candidate got at least 50% of the vote, that was it, and the winner is declared. Now they are saying something different, and it's not clear to me what the "plus 1" is.

Tasner Hasenpfeffer's avatar

A majority is more than 50%, that is, at least one vote more.

50% exactly is a tie, and on a yes or no question, 50% exactly would mean the proposal fails.

Linda1961 aka Pollyanna's avatar

Thanks

Trux Mint In Box's avatar

Kansas electing a Dem governor again or how Beshear keeps winning Kentucky I think implies that once voters in some of these red states see that Democrats arenโ€™t the monsters described on Fox News that they will keep voting for good candidates regardless of party. Which is why Republicans should be terrified about what just happened in places like Texas.

Cogswell's avatar

After Peltola wins we will have 56 seats in the senate plus the two independents that caucus with the Dems.

desimomo's avatar

I actually think the 56 includes Bernie and Angus, sorry

Linda1961 aka Pollyanna's avatar

It could end up being 55, if Fetterman leaves the Dems, and that is fine by me.

John_atx's avatar

I am wondering if Murkowski goes independent (again?) and caucus with the Democrats in the Senate.

Linda1961 aka Pollyanna's avatar

That's a possibility, and I'd be fine with that too.

Resist Herr GropenFuhrer's avatar

I really like Van Hollen. I don't like Schumer much. He seems to think he's entitled to be the leader. Van Hollen wants to fight for it. We need the fighter.

I'd better stop here, I'm running out of civility ...

Cincinnatus's avatar

Colom raised a good point that two leaders (Schumer/Jeffries) from the same urban area isn't a good look. He said he will listen and keep an open mind.

Linda1961 aka Pollyanna's avatar

I hadn't thought of that, but Colom is right. He's already showing good sense, which we need in our leaders.