One more time: we don't care what your "feelings" are about this issue. We don't care if your fake "science" pretends otherwise. There is NO SLAVERY in this country, and you cannot force a woman to use her body in a way she doesn't want to use it in.
“It’s a standard that’s been applied for centuries to determine the life of a human being,” Gaustad told a three-judge panel of the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments on both cases.
For centuries, I believe the standard was a two-part test: (a) wait and see if the mother died; and if not, (b) let the baby be born, and wait and see if it died.
Outside of North Fucking Dakota, things have progressed since then. I guess Daniel Gaustad, Esq. didn't get the memo.
The 12th century seems about right for this fucknut, so I&#039;ll go with Ibn Zuhr&#039;s <i>Kitab al-Taisir fi al-Mudawat wa al-Tadbir</i>.
(Might as well asplode his empty head with a Muslin book.)
In the Teabagger-Xtard-wingnut world, the &quot;Judeo&quot; part is a meaningless introductory phrase . . . just like &quot;A well-regulated militia.&quot;
Bu what about the standard that&rsquo;s been applied for centuries to determine the price of a human being? Where&#039;s the respect for <strike>tradition</strike> our heritage?
In Sparta and Rome the father had to recognize the baby. If not, they would either throw it off a cliff (Sparta) or leave it in the woods fit fate to decide (Rome). Have yet to see this century old custom come back.
Will I need to legally change my name to &quot;Your Fetus&quot; or can I just redefine words however I wish, North Dakota style?
I grew up in a Petri dish, but back then we called it a city. Now I live in the wilderness, which used to be called the wilderness.
Hey, you gotta show your family some <i>love,</i> you know...
One more time: we don&#039;t care what your &quot;feelings&quot; are about this issue. We don&#039;t care if your fake &quot;science&quot; pretends otherwise. There is NO SLAVERY in this country, and you cannot force a woman to use her body in a way she doesn&#039;t want to use it in.
&quot;Pro-life&quot; women are volunteering to carry unwanted fetuses, right?
Reinsertion: When withdrawal didn&#039;t work?
So we&#039;ve moved on from Orwell to Huxley? Not an improvement.
I&rsquo;ve heard a fetus can survive for over a hundred years outside of the womb and yet many republicans reuse to GTFO.
<em>... a fetus can survive for several days with medical assistance even in the first trimester. </em>
Umm ... would this also apply to sperm, if it was contained in a Kleenex or maybe a sock? Asking for a friend...
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a standard that&rsquo;s been applied for centuries to determine the life of a human being,&rdquo; Gaustad told a three-judge panel of the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments on both cases.
For centuries, I believe the standard was a two-part test: (a) wait and see if the mother died; and if not, (b) let the baby be born, and wait and see if it died.
Outside of North Fucking Dakota, things have progressed since then. I guess Daniel Gaustad, Esq. didn&#039;t get the memo.
The 12th century seems about right for this fucknut, so I&#039;ll go with Ibn Zuhr&#039;s <i>Kitab al-Taisir fi al-Mudawat wa al-Tadbir</i>.
(Might as well asplode his empty head with a Muslin book.)
In the Teabagger-Xtard-wingnut world, the &quot;Judeo&quot; part is a meaningless introductory phrase . . . just like &quot;A well-regulated militia.&quot;
We&#039;re gonna need a bigger abortionplex.
Graduate of Acme Law School.
Bu what about the standard that&rsquo;s been applied for centuries to determine the price of a human being? Where&#039;s the respect for <strike>tradition</strike> our heritage?
In Sparta and Rome the father had to recognize the baby. If not, they would either throw it off a cliff (Sparta) or leave it in the woods fit fate to decide (Rome). Have yet to see this century old custom come back.