43 Comments
User's avatar
π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Let's back up just a bit and look at some facts:

1. A very, very small number of very well-educated people are smart enough to get into Harvard Law School. 2. Of these, a very small fraction have the analytical and writing skills necessary to get onto the Law Review. 3. These people, from among themselves, <i>chose Barack Obama</i> to review and edit their work.

So, either Obama can't write, or Jack Cashill is an idiot and an asshole. This is not a hard question, and even racist imbecile teabaggers should be able to puzzle it out if you give them a week or two. Not all of 'em, I know, but some of 'em.

SullivanSt's avatar

Yes indeedy. They even have a name for their favorite usages of it: \"ontological argument\". A better name would probably be \"illogical argument\".

SullivanSt's avatar

OK, who's ghostwriting your comments now? I mean, noone who would commit such a glaring grammar faux-pas as writing "<a href="http:\/\/wonkette.com\/476492\/obama-biographer-accused-of-fraud-for-editing-obamas-appalling-grammar#IDComment390169082" target="_blank">But he's still a looser, right?</a>" could ever possibly think by themselves to use the umlaut in "Varmblüt".

SullivanSt's avatar

Phrenology pah! Just look at the zodiac! Obama seeks balance and is coolly intellectual - classic traits of a Libra, so how could he possibly have been born on August 2nd? Checkmate!

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

That does seems to be what throws these goobers into such a mouthbreating rage: the notion that a black guy has an IQ that's at least 40 points higher than their own.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

In Wingnuttistan, two preposterous fabrications are always better than one, even if they're mutually exclusive. Real Americans™ like to have choices.

Chris Grrr's avatar

"terrorist emeritus" - yet another bitchin' name for my new band.

Chris Grrr's avatar

Γ’Β™Βͺ I need a unit to sample and hold But not the angry one A new design New design Γ’Β™Βͺ

Chris Grrr's avatar

Never before has there been a brilliant guy who failed to demonstrate it in every form of schoolwork. EVAR!

SullivanSt's avatar

I mentioned elsewhere, it's called "assuming the premise to prove the premise", and it's a sign of a very weak and/or dishonest mind.

SullivanSt's avatar

They find them easy to masturbate to, of course.

SullivanSt's avatar

When <em>trіg</em>gered, the censorbot acts without retаrdation.

bobbert's avatar

In German, subject-verb agreement is a guessing game.

π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Or an Austrian Warmblood.

Of course, if it's really <i>Varmblüt ...</i>