The truth has come out: Barack Obama is not a genius. We're sorry, we know you have always thought this to be true. But a very serious man and inadvertent Obama scholar by the name of Jack Cashill has encountered some EGREGIOUS ERRORS (subtle grammatical changes) in letters that were printed in the new Obama biography, David Maraniss's Barack Obama: The Story, parts of which were also
Let's back up just a bit and look at some facts:
1. A very, very small number of very well-educated people are smart enough to get into Harvard Law School. 2. Of these, a very small fraction have the analytical and writing skills necessary to get onto the Law Review. 3. These people, from among themselves, <i>chose Barack Obama</i> to review and edit their work.
So, either Obama can&#039;t write, or Jack Cashill is an idiot and an asshole. This is not a hard question, and even racist imbecile teabaggers should be able to puzzle it out if you give them a week or two. Not all of &#039;em, I know, but some of &#039;em.
OK, who&#039;s ghostwriting your comments now? I mean, noone who would commit such a glaring grammar faux-pas as writing &quot;<a href="http:\/\/wonkette.com\/476492\/obama-biographer-accused-of-fraud-for-editing-obamas-appalling-grammar#IDComment390169082" target="_blank">But he&#039;s still a looser, right?</a>&quot; could ever possibly think by themselves to use the umlaut in &quot;Varmbl&uuml;t&quot;.
Phrenology pah! Just look at the zodiac! Obama seeks balance and is coolly intellectual - classic traits of a Libra, so how could he possibly have been born on August 2nd? Checkmate!
That does seems to be what throws these goobers into such a mouthbreating rage: the notion that a black guy has an IQ that&#039;s at least 40 points higher than their own.
In Wingnuttistan, two preposterous fabrications are always better than one, even if they&#039;re mutually exclusive. Real Americans&trade; like to have choices.
I mentioned elsewhere, it&#039;s called &quot;assuming the premise to prove the premise&quot;, and it&#039;s a sign of a very weak and/or dishonest mind.
But he&#039;s still a looser, right?
Let&#039;s back up just a bit and look at some facts:
1. A very, very small number of very well-educated people are smart enough to get into Harvard Law School. 2. Of these, a very small fraction have the analytical and writing skills necessary to get onto the Law Review. 3. These people, from among themselves, <i>chose Barack Obama</i> to review and edit their work.
So, either Obama can&#039;t write, or Jack Cashill is an idiot and an asshole. This is not a hard question, and even racist imbecile teabaggers should be able to puzzle it out if you give them a week or two. Not all of &#039;em, I know, but some of &#039;em.
Yes indeedy. They even have a name for their favorite usages of it: \"ontological argument\". A better name would probably be \"illogical argument\".
OK, who&#039;s ghostwriting your comments now? I mean, noone who would commit such a glaring grammar faux-pas as writing &quot;<a href="http:\/\/wonkette.com\/476492\/obama-biographer-accused-of-fraud-for-editing-obamas-appalling-grammar#IDComment390169082" target="_blank">But he&#039;s still a looser, right?</a>&quot; could ever possibly think by themselves to use the umlaut in &quot;Varmbl&uuml;t&quot;.
Phrenology pah! Just look at the zodiac! Obama seeks balance and is coolly intellectual - classic traits of a Libra, so how could he possibly have been born on August 2nd? Checkmate!
That does seems to be what throws these goobers into such a mouthbreating rage: the notion that a black guy has an IQ that&#039;s at least 40 points higher than their own.
I think they spell it &quot;Liebra.&quot;
In Wingnuttistan, two preposterous fabrications are always better than one, even if they&#039;re mutually exclusive. Real Americans&trade; like to have choices.
&quot;terrorist emeritus&quot; - yet another bitchin&#039; name for my new band.
Γ’ΒΒͺ I need a unit to sample and hold But not the angry one A new design New design Γ’ΒΒͺ
Never before has there been a brilliant guy who failed to demonstrate it in every form of schoolwork. EVAR!
I mentioned elsewhere, it&#039;s called &quot;assuming the premise to prove the premise&quot;, and it&#039;s a sign of a very weak and/or dishonest mind.
They find them easy to masturbate to, of course.
When <em>trΓΒg</em>gered, the censorbot acts without retΓΒ°rdation.
In German, subject-verb agreement is a guessing game.
Or an Austrian Warmblood.
Of course, if it&#039;s really <i>Varmbl&uuml;t ...</i>