Why not make it $85 per hour, like Congress makes (assuming 40h week, ha ha)? Or pay Congress $7.50 per hour. That way we could have teenagers do the work.
As usual, Republicans think more money for millionaires is an incentive to work harder. While more money for lower-income is a disincentive to work harder.
...<strong>FYI</strong>: Shyt for brains, I was a manager for Wal-Mart(you know; the largest most profitable private employer in the U.S.)for 2 and half years. That company pays 2 pubic hairs shy of the minimum wage to beginning hourly workers...oh yeah and the average age of its employees is 27 years old.
The minimum wage doesn&#039;t have to be a living wage, but we should couple it to other wages. Let&#039;s say minimum wage is 15% of Congressional pay. Or X% of some military rank&#039;s pay. Or enough to pay booze and smokes taxes in Kansas.
Yes, $10.10 per hour isn&#039;t enough to live on. But it is a whole hell of a lot more to live on than $7.25. And if someone&#039;s arguing for a $50/hour wage, I&#039;d like to meet them and say hello to the unicorn they are astride.
Baconz, darling, I don&#039;t know what time it is where you are, but do have yourself a wee cocktail and a deep breath. I can hear you hyperventilating from here, and we don&#039;t want you commenting from the ICU.
There was a time when I didn&#039;t think I was smart enough to be in Congress. Boy, have the republicans ever changed my mind! They prove over and over again that &quot;smart&quot; and &quot;congress&quot; have nothing to do with one another.
I nearly didn&#039;t recognize him. Isn&#039;t he more often shirtless?
...geez, they don&#039;t make these &quot;back benchers&quot; like they use to anymore.
Why not make it $85 per hour, like Congress makes (assuming 40h week, ha ha)? Or pay Congress $7.50 per hour. That way we could have teenagers do the work.
As usual, Republicans think more money for millionaires is an incentive to work harder. While more money for lower-income is a disincentive to work harder.
We could cut his taxes AND his salary to zero, and he&#039;ll pay for himself... I think that&#039;s how it works...
But some of them poorz wouldn&#039;t vote for me anyway, so like what&#039;s the point?
...<strong>FYI</strong>: Shyt for brains, I was a manager for Wal-Mart(you know; the largest most profitable private employer in the U.S.)for 2 and half years. That company pays 2 pubic hairs shy of the minimum wage to beginning hourly workers...oh yeah and the average age of its employees is 27 years old.
The minimum wage doesn&#039;t have to be a living wage, but we should couple it to other wages. Let&#039;s say minimum wage is 15% of Congressional pay. Or X% of some military rank&#039;s pay. Or enough to pay booze and smokes taxes in Kansas.
Back? Or bottom?
GOP arguments always end in &quot;...ghazi&quot;.
to be fair most T-critters have the emotional IQ of teenagers so yea, why not pay them like the pimply-faced idjits that they are.
Yes, $10.10 per hour isn&#039;t enough to live on. But it is a whole hell of a lot more to live on than $7.25. And if someone&#039;s arguing for a $50/hour wage, I&#039;d like to meet them and say hello to the unicorn they are astride.
Baconz, darling, I don&#039;t know what time it is where you are, but do have yourself a wee cocktail and a deep breath. I can hear you hyperventilating from here, and we don&#039;t want you commenting from the ICU.
There was a time when I didn&#039;t think I was smart enough to be in Congress. Boy, have the republicans ever changed my mind! They prove over and over again that &quot;smart&quot; and &quot;congress&quot; have nothing to do with one another.
I see that someone helped him dress for the interview.