What, huh? Did you have trouble parsing that headline? It didn't really make much sense, right? But have you considered that the problem might not be the headline, which is doing the best it can, bless its little anthropomorphized headline heart, but the story it is trying to explain? The story stars one Orly Taitz, after all -- a woman who contains multitudes as she is a lawyer, dentist, future US senator from the
Why is anyone surprised at this? Orly Taitz is unabashedly advocating the Republican Party's position that elections don't count, voters can't be trusted, democracy is wrong unless they win.
Clinton impeachment. Bush v Gore Voter ID laws. Where's the birth certificate? Wrong font size. Citzens United is just.
It occurs to me that the common commenting qualifier <em>OT</em> as in <em>Off Topic</em>, and <em>OT</em> as in <em>Orly Tai[n]tzted</em>, are indistinguishable.
But among the &quot;barred&quot;, filing utter nonsense is usually frowned upon and, indeed, cause for sanction. Apart form that one time in Georgia, Orly&#039;s endless stream of nonsense filings has gone bewilderingly unpunished.
Speaking of vexatious litigants, can you just <em>feel</em> the irony dripping from <a href="http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/86818535\/Liberi-v-Taitz-Plffs-MSJ-Against-Todd-Sankey-and-the-Sankey-Firm-Inc-Doc-480" target="_blank">this case</a>?
Yes, it does seem the <a href="http:\/\/wonkette.com\/412157\/heres-some-great-news-about-orly-taitz" target="_blank">hotter, hornier, wetter, tighter</a> sex phase is very much over.
My vexatious/irony comment would&#039;ve been much more on point if reality matched my conflation of <a href="http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2009\/03\/17\/709522\/-Who-is-Philip-J-Berg-" target="_blank">this guy</a> with <a href="http:\/\/bit.ly\/KhtiFe" target="_blank">this other guy</a>
<blockquote>And they probably cannot believe it, because how was this lady admitted to the bar? Confused face!</blockquote>
Yeah, seriously. I mean, I&#039;m not a lawyer, but I can recognize when someone has absolutely no fucking clue what the law is or how it works, and that&#039;s what I see in every single Orly filing.
<i>Indeed, she provided no legal basis to explain why Dunn&rsquo;s voter registration card had any relevancy to his eligibility as a candidate.</i>
Next she&#039;ll sue the judges for not taking her seriously. And just existing in general.
I&#039;ll bet they zipped out this opinion while they were waiting for their Keurig coffee cup to fill.
Just be thankful she wasn&#39;t kinky.
Why is anyone surprised at this? Orly Taitz is unabashedly advocating the Republican Party&#039;s position that elections don&#039;t count, voters can&#039;t be trusted, democracy is wrong unless they win.
Clinton impeachment. Bush v Gore Voter ID laws. Where&#039;s the birth certificate? Wrong font size. Citzens United is just.
It occurs to me that the common commenting qualifier <em>OT</em> as in <em>Off Topic</em>, and <em>OT</em> as in <em>Orly Tai[n]tzted</em>, are indistinguishable.
As in OT is always OT.
But among the &quot;barred&quot;, filing utter nonsense is usually frowned upon and, indeed, cause for sanction. Apart form that one time in Georgia, Orly&#039;s endless stream of nonsense filings has gone bewilderingly unpunished.
Which wouldn&#039;t make any sense, because Orly.
<blockquote>bless its little anthropomorphized headline heart,</blockquote>
...is like a little blip of starbursts in my Hobo Beansey day.
Speaking of vexatious litigants, can you just <em>feel</em> the irony dripping from <a href="http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/86818535\/Liberi-v-Taitz-Plffs-MSJ-Against-Todd-Sankey-and-the-Sankey-Firm-Inc-Doc-480" target="_blank">this case</a>?
Yes, it does seem the <a href="http:\/\/wonkette.com\/412157\/heres-some-great-news-about-orly-taitz" target="_blank">hotter, hornier, wetter, tighter</a> sex phase is very much over.
My vexatious/irony comment would&#039;ve been much more on point if reality matched my conflation of <a href="http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2009\/03\/17\/709522\/-Who-is-Philip-J-Berg-" target="_blank">this guy</a> with <a href="http:\/\/bit.ly\/KhtiFe" target="_blank">this other guy</a>
Pic captionz corner ...
&quot;<em>Really</em> - it was <em>this</em> big ... &quot;
<blockquote>And they probably cannot believe it, because how was this lady admitted to the bar? Confused face!</blockquote>
Yeah, seriously. I mean, I&#039;m not a lawyer, but I can recognize when someone has absolutely no fucking clue what the law is or how it works, and that&#039;s what I see in every single Orly filing.
To me, it reads more like the shorter-still
&quot;Taitz GTFO&quot;
And who in their right minds would submit a motion for her to be admitted <em>pro hac vice</em> in states outside California?
Oh, I see how that happens now.
<i>Indeed, she provided no legal basis to explain why Dunn&rsquo;s voter registration card had any relevancy to his eligibility as a candidate.</i>
Next she&#039;ll sue the judges for not taking her seriously. And just existing in general.
I&#039;ll bet they zipped out this opinion while they were waiting for their Keurig coffee cup to fill.