17 Comments

It's like they are jealous off the smack down Kennedy gave the state of Colorado and want a sound <em>Romer vs Evans</em>ing of their own.

Expand full comment

Sadly, I understood that.

Expand full comment

What? Besides pissing off Mike Lee and David Vitter? You set a high bar.

Expand full comment

And, how about post-marital sex?

Expand full comment

Nice idea, but I'm not sure it would work for me.

Expand full comment

Isn't that exactly what it means? Misery loves company, and is willing to enact legislation to mandate it.

Expand full comment

What about those of us who want to have sex, but have no intention of getting married? Grey area?

Expand full comment

Jeez . . . don't go giving them ideas, OK?

Expand full comment

Not if they're Republican.

Expand full comment

Certainly should allow voters to discriminate against him.

Expand full comment

Dink and Dill. How appropriate.

Expand full comment

I won't discriminate against you, but perhaps you should be more discriminating about who you have butt sechs with. You could do so much better.

Expand full comment

Haven't made it passed the first few sentences yet but really, "discriminate against anybody who engages in premarital sex." Oh yeah, that will be real popular. I notice he didn't mention anything about extramarital sex. Is there something Mr. Lee should tell Mrs. Lee, or can we do it for him? MWHAHAHAHa

Expand full comment

This is what happens when the sexually repressed are elected to office. We need a law that prevents THIS from happening.

Expand full comment

Hiring and firing based on some boss's interpretation of one of the Bibles or Koran or what the voices in their heads say. What could go wrong?

Expand full comment

Like I said before: If they're paying employees with prayers, discriminate away. But if they're using currency backed by the United States Government, the rules are different.

Expand full comment