17 Comments
User's avatar
SullivanSt's avatar

It's like they are jealous off the smack down Kennedy gave the state of Colorado and want a sound <em>Romer vs Evans</em>ing of their own.

bobbert's avatar

Sadly, I understood that.

bobbert's avatar

What? Besides pissing off Mike Lee and David Vitter? You set a high bar.

bobbert's avatar

And, how about post-marital sex?

bobbert's avatar

Nice idea, but I'm not sure it would work for me.

Jared James's avatar

Isn't that exactly what it means? Misery loves company, and is willing to enact legislation to mandate it.

Jared James's avatar

What about those of us who want to have sex, but have no intention of getting married? Grey area?

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

Jeez . . . don't go giving them ideas, OK?

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

Certainly should allow voters to discriminate against him.

Tiny kaiju's avatar

I won't discriminate against you, but perhaps you should be more discriminating about who you have butt sechs with. You could do so much better.

Tiny kaiju's avatar

Haven't made it passed the first few sentences yet but really, "discriminate against anybody who engages in premarital sex." Oh yeah, that will be real popular. I notice he didn't mention anything about extramarital sex. Is there something Mr. Lee should tell Mrs. Lee, or can we do it for him? MWHAHAHAHa

Painter of Goats's avatar

This is what happens when the sexually repressed are elected to office. We need a law that prevents THIS from happening.

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

Hiring and firing based on some boss's interpretation of one of the Bibles or Koran or what the voices in their heads say. What could go wrong?

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

Like I said before: If they're paying employees with prayers, discriminate away. But if they're using currency backed by the United States Government, the rules are different.