7 Comments
User's avatar
Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

Of course, we simply meant "Cannibalism (with votes!)" --The Church

fuflans's avatar

by all accounts we will have an awesome number of repubs to amuse us until the rapture.

SheriffRoscoe's avatar

As a fundie kid, the subject of transubstantiation always intrigued me, because we (being the newer kids on the block, faithwise,) never believed that shit was literally true. But over the course of time, I researched and learned some amazing things. For instance, there was a time when debating and questioning the validity of the doctrine of turning bread and wine into actual flesh and blood would get a person tortured and probably killed. Then came the scientists with their atheist microscopes and the church was all 'oh yeah we always meant that figuratively, blah blah blah...'

But beyond all that, it always amazed me that someone would think that eating a person's flesh and drinking their blood -- <i> even figuratively, </i> was a cool thing to do. To me, it was some messed up shit. Thus began my long walk on the road to hell, for refusing to believe all that crazy without questioning it.

SheriffRoscoe's avatar

Did you know that some of us imagine that you are, in actuality, David Boies, prommie? Don't tell me! I don't want to know the truth!

Monsieur_Grumpe's avatar

Take the quiz. Hint! All answers are "You're going to go to hell. " <a href="http:\/\/religion.blogs.cnn.com\/2010\/09\/28\/dont-know-much-about-religion-youre-not-alone-study-finds\/\?hpt=C1" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/28/dont-kno...">http://religion.blogs.cnn.c...

PsycWench's avatar

If southern Protestants knew more about Christianity, they might find out that a lot of Christians don't have a problem with the theory of evolution. We can't have that!

PsycWench's avatar

That would be funny if it weren't completely true.