10 Comments
User's avatar
schmannity's avatar

If Rand says it's okay to shotgun drones, I'll be down at the mall with a box of shells.

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

<i>“But if they fly over my house, they better beware because I’ve got a shotgun,”</i>

The Jetsons -- accurate in so many other ways -- didn't see this coming.

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

Pro tip for Rand Paul: The dangerous drones are out of shotgun range. You need a <a href="http:\/\/www.dailytech.com\/Navy Develops New AntiUAV Lasers for Humvees\/article30233.htm" target="_blank">"laser"</a>.

Spotts1701, Taking Bible Guns's avatar

"Get offa my PROPERTY!" *BLAM*

"Hey, my Amazon order!"

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

We'll all remember where we where when CNN's Historic Snap Chat took place. It was almost like Rand Paul was a Historic Hologram driving a Historic Blizzardmobile in a black hole.

PubOption's avatar

Bagpipes have drones, does Rand think shooting a piper would be acceptable?

The Quirk's avatar

Thing is, these aren't Big Gummint drones, these are private or business drones. The constitution doesn't say dick about them, just as there's nothing in there about Big Business data-mining and selling your information.

Olav_Pompatus's avatar

I thought Rand Paul filibustering for 13 hours was the textbook example of "droning".

chascates's avatar

Off topic but a story I love: Before WWII David Niven was invited to a country hunt at some wealthy minor royal's estate. This was still when they had messenger pigeons. His host had shot one of those pigeons rather than the expected grouse and all the guests had gathered around it, not saying anything. Niven walks up and asks "Are there any letters for me?". He said he was never invited back.

bobbert's avatar

There is no such thing as an ophthalmologist.