"The defendant argues that he presents 'no risk of recidivism . . .given the harsh lesson [he] has already learned, especially in light of his age.' Doc. 317 at 24. There is no reason to believe this is so, and Manafort cites no evidence."
"The defendant argues that he presents 'no risk of recidivism . . .given the harsh lesson [he] has already learned, especially in light of his age.' Doc. 317 at 24. There is no reason to believe this is so, and Manafort cites no evidence."
At least the other Manaforts won't miss him.
From the government's reply:
"The defendant argues that he presents 'no risk of recidivism . . .given the harsh lesson [he] has already learned, especially in light of his age.' Doc. 317 at 24. There is no reason to believe this is so, and Manafort cites no evidence."
That's legalese for "Bu-u-u-ull shit!"
From the government's reply:
"The defendant argues that he presents 'no risk of recidivism . . .given the harsh lesson [he] has already learned, especially in light of his age.' Doc. 317 at 24. There is no reason to believe this is so, and Manafort cites no evidence."
That's legalese for "Bu-u-u-ull shit!"
At least the other Manaforts won't miss him.