Yes - it was in Muellers report and I know that newspapers were printing this way back - I went back as far as Apr 2019 and found articles with this exact same wording of the information - and if we read the Mueller report it was partially redacted, but we knew about it
In addition to "Who Funds the Federalist" -- a question to which we as yet have no fact-based response even though diligent investigative types have been asking for literal years 00 should we also be asking "Who Funds the Intercept"?
Not trying to be an ass - but this was in Muellers Report - and was heavily documented in Newspaper articles back then - I went back and pulled up articles written in early 2019 that had this exact same coverage and information - this really isn't new, other than Congress confirming the info with their report as well
His charges already included this initially - although they weren't used as part of the final sentencing info, so not sure if filing the same charges again would work?
It wouldn't have verified that their communications channels worked?
Hillary didn't have to guess. She knew.
Not nearly severe enough.
Pence has been a Koch property for his entire political career. So, that's a very good question...
Thank you for posting this. I was just about to ask the same question.
I've seen them perform, and this one ALWAYS brings down the house!!!! "Magic Dick on his licking' stick."
Call me when you're Finnish.
Don't you mean Microfloppin?
But always seems to need more cowbells....
I'll be outside, Roman.
He was in debt to Oleg Deripaska.
I've always suspected that had a LOT to do with why he "offered" his "services" to the "Trump campaign" gratis.
People forget that the fingers in every Republican pie since Nixon went under the consulting firm name Black, Manafort, Stone, and Atwater.
Every one of those is the "oh THAT [last name]" people should think it is.
Yes - it was in Muellers report and I know that newspapers were printing this way back - I went back as far as Apr 2019 and found articles with this exact same wording of the information - and if we read the Mueller report it was partially redacted, but we knew about it
In addition to "Who Funds the Federalist" -- a question to which we as yet have no fact-based response even though diligent investigative types have been asking for literal years 00 should we also be asking "Who Funds the Intercept"?
Not trying to be an ass - but this was in Muellers Report - and was heavily documented in Newspaper articles back then - I went back and pulled up articles written in early 2019 that had this exact same coverage and information - this really isn't new, other than Congress confirming the info with their report as well
His charges already included this initially - although they weren't used as part of the final sentencing info, so not sure if filing the same charges again would work?