An Iowa newspaper editor who was fired after blogging about how The Gays are going to hell and taking America with them is now suing his former newspaper, claiming that he's a victim of religious discrimination.Let's all pour one out for poor oppressed Bob Eschliman, the former editor of the Newton Daily News, who was shitcanned just because he wrote a piece on his personal blog decrying a website called
As I said, it depends on what your job is. I am in the uneviable position of ocassionally making those judgment calls as to whether a communication rises to the level of "conduct on or off the job that adversely affects job performance or which adversely reflects on [insert employer] and its mission". Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. It often depends on what is said, to whom, whether the person identifies themselves as an employee of "X". Example - I had to terminate an employee who posted numerous Twitter messages about how much they enjoyed smoking pot and how awful we were as an employer. All of the comments were not during working hours, but they identified themselves as an employee on their Twitter profile and engaged in personal attacks against fellow employees. If more people became aware, then our reputation and credibility would be jeopardized, so we had to initiate disciplinary action.
Charles Sheldon coined the phrase "What Would Jesus Do" in the late 1800s. I can't find if he was rich, but he was cheated by his publisher so could have been richer.
Todays WWJD crowd should also think about What Would Charles Sheldon Do? Among other things he was &quot;a strong supporter of the feminist struggle for equal rights, he urged women to enter politics. He also pushed for full equality in the workplace.&quot; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wik..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Monroe_Sheld...">http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Haha, my dad once told me that he didn&#039;t mind gays as long as they didn&#039;t hit on him. I told him he was too unattractive for gay men. This possibility had clearly never entered his mind.
<i>[Jesus] said there would be deceivers. He said those deceivers would cause Christians who remain true to His teachings to become reviled. He said false prophets would follow to deceive even more, and that lawlessness will abound.</i>
Hmmm. &quot;Causing them to become reviled&quot;, you say? Lemme go read again about all those Xtian death threats against Planned Parenthood clinics (and the ice cream shops that support them.) And the Xtian threats against buses full of brown kids.
Gazpacho isn&#039;t really soup, it&#039;s more like really chunky V8.
I only have enough brain cells available for thinking about &quot;WWm_pD?&quot;
DECEIVERS! Judas Priests! At least according to my dead-tree news&#039; Letters to the Editor.
To be fair, they&#039;re ALWAYS looking askance at the Pope. And the Joooooz, who started this whole thing.
See also-- Any History Of Ireland, the OSA freaks, et cetera.
As I said, it depends on what your job is. I am in the uneviable position of ocassionally making those judgment calls as to whether a communication rises to the level of &quot;conduct on or off the job that adversely affects job performance or which adversely reflects on [insert employer] and its mission&quot;. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn&#039;t. It often depends on what is said, to whom, whether the person identifies themselves as an employee of &quot;X&quot;. Example - I had to terminate an employee who posted numerous Twitter messages about how much they enjoyed smoking pot and how awful we were as an employer. All of the comments were not during working hours, but they identified themselves as an employee on their Twitter profile and engaged in personal attacks against fellow employees. If more people became aware, then our reputation and credibility would be jeopardized, so we had to initiate disciplinary action.
That&#039;s undecidable.
With a side of Glory Hole.
If I could, I would. But I really shouldn&#039;t, so I won&#039;t.
Let alone The People&#039;s Commission for Extraordinarily Gay Affairs
Charles Sheldon coined the phrase &quot;What Would Jesus Do&quot; in the late 1800s. I can&#039;t find if he was rich, but he was cheated by his publisher so could have been richer.
Todays WWJD crowd should also think about What Would Charles Sheldon Do? Among other things he was &quot;a strong supporter of the feminist struggle for equal rights, he urged women to enter politics. He also pushed for full equality in the workplace.&quot; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wik..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Monroe_Sheld...">http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Does Hasbro make a toy version of the Gayroller complete with tiny homophobic Weebles? I totes want one.
Haha, my dad once told me that he didn&#039;t mind gays as long as they didn&#039;t hit on him. I told him he was too unattractive for gay men. This possibility had clearly never entered his mind.
Let&rsquo;s all pour one out on poor oppressed Bob Eschliman.
FIFY.
Also, too, &quot;harder&quot; is not a good safe word.
<i>[Jesus] said there would be deceivers. He said those deceivers would cause Christians who remain true to His teachings to become reviled. He said false prophets would follow to deceive even more, and that lawlessness will abound.</i>
Hmmm. &quot;Causing them to become reviled&quot;, you say? Lemme go read again about all those Xtian death threats against Planned Parenthood clinics (and the ice cream shops that support them.) And the Xtian threats against buses full of brown kids.