literally paid to lie to people, for a job Let's talk about a hero this morning! His name is Brian Karem, and he is a White House reporter who writes for DC area regional papers, and also for Playboy , and he is TIRED OF SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS'S SHIT. So Tuesday, during one of the only televised press briefings we've had lately (guess Steve Bannon decided
Which proves my point about liberals and their intolerance for differing views. It's not like the double standards of liberal moderators is a secret. Liberal moderators ban people for an opposing view or posting facts that conflict with their agenda(s).
I also like the hypocrisy you employ on forums you do not moderate. You will attack and insult people relentlessly, but you get upset if someone does it to you or another liberal in return.
Hillary's email incident was illegal. How are you not aware of that? You are upset about claims against Hillary being unproven, but you go on to call Trump a racist, which hasn't been proven. Speculation, bias, hate, opinion and insults are not proof.
The better person won.
Can you list anything bad that Trump has done while president? I ask people this all of the time, but they come empty. Usually all they do is hide behind insults.
Voter ID laws are simply voter suppression. The GNoP can't win fair and square - demographics are destiny and the dinosaur party is on the way out. So it gerrymanders voting districts, purges legitimate voters from the rolls, and pushes racists Voter ID laws to try to cling to power. It will fail.
Actually, voter ID laws are to ensure votes are legal and accurate. Anyone can obtain one of the multiple IDs required to vote. So how exactly is it suppression when anyone can obtain an ID?
Doesn't it make sense to show a valid ID? You need an ID to drive, open a bank account, get a job, buy a gun, purchase a house/car, go to college and so forth... Are they suppressing people who want these aforementioned items?
"purges legitimate voters from the rolls"
Don't these legitimate voters have IDs? If not, then why don't they get one?
"pushes racists Voter ID laws"
There is nothing racist about them. All races can obtain one of the IDs required to vote.
The time magazine cover framed and hung in one of Cheeto-assholes golf clubs is actually a fake. Cheeto-ego has these fake magazine covers produced (and paid for by his fake charity, you know? the one New York shut down), as ego masturbation. Hence my amusement. Liberals pull the strings and Trumpanzees fail to see the snark and parody every time. Sadly, most of the time,the gap toothed, mouth breathing idiots who follow the orange sex offender don't even know when they are being scammed. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
I didn't say it wasn't fake. The liberals are all upset over a meaningless poster on his property.
Fake charity? You mean like the Clinton Foundation?
Sex offender? You mean like Bill Clinton.
Trump is in your heads 24/7. All you people have are insults. "I know, I will refer to Trump as a Cheeto. That will show them. Victory is ours".
I recall liberals throwing quite the fit when Trump drove his golf cart onto his own green.
So what exactly has Trump done as president that is actually bad? I keep asking this question, but the liberals always go silent...or they hurl some insults.
"The Truth:" Purging voters from the rolls (for example, down in Florida, were legitimate voters were removed for crimes they might commit in the future) has nothing to do with ID's. If you aren't familiar with the consistent efforts by the Republican Party to cage voters, you should be.
A series of laws passed in the past year by Ohio's Republican state legislature and Gov. John Kasich have waived the last three days of in-person early voting before Election Day for all but members of the military. Civilians now have until Friday, Nov. 2,to cast those ballots and must arrive at the booth before 6 p.m.
Republicans faulted the extra time for civilians as too costly for local governments and prone to fraud and abuse. Meanwhile, service members were exempt from the restrictions, allowing them to vote at any time before polls close, an extra three days without restrictions.
As previously reported by ABC News, the Obama campaign sued the Buckeye State last month to block those laws from taking effect, restoring weekend voting as it was in 2008. Democrats say those last days before Nov. 6 give a crucial extra cushion for Americans who might not have had the opportunity to enter the voting booth in the days prior. If the challenge is successful, they say, military voters would not see any difference in their rights.
The notion that President Obama -- or any other rational politician -- would seek to curtail the right to vote of servicemen and women is absurd. Yet Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney peddled that canard in an attempt to win votes in this critical battleground state. Ohio voters weres too savvy to fall for such nonsense.
Voting by people who aren't eligible simply isn't a problem. The proposed "cure" is far worse than the disease.
We finally have what appears to be a verified case of voter fraud by impersonation. The accused is a Republican (go figure!). And since it involves an absentee ballot, it isn’t at all clear to me how requiring an ID would have prevented this from happening.
In briefing filed with the Supreme Court in the Crawford v. Marion County Election Board case, the State of Indiana and several of its allied amici again fail to justify Indiana’s photo ID law.
They recite various examples of problems that the challenged law would not solve. They fail, however, to provide any evidence that in-person impersonation fraud — the only misconduct that photo ID rules could possibly prevent — is a problem, let alone one justifying the burdens of a restrictive photo ID rule.
In these submissions, it is easy to get distracted by noise. The briefs — submitted by the State of Indiana, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Attorney Generals of nine states, a national political party, members of Congress, various election officials, and several nonprofit organizations —contain more than 250 citations to reports of election problems.
But not one of the sources cited shows proof of a vote that Indiana’s law could prevent. That is, not one of the citations offered by Indiana or its allies refers to a proven example of a single vote cast at the polls in someone else’s name that could be stopped by a pollsite photo ID rule.
Even including suspected but unproven reports of fraud, the State and its allies have uncovered remarkably little evidence of any misconduct that Indiana’s law could prevent. Out of almost 400 million votes cast in general elections alone since 2000, the briefs cite one attempt at impersonation that was thwarted without a photo ID requirement, and nine unresolved cases where impersonation fraud at the polls was suspected but not proven.3 Nine possible examples out of hundreds of millions — and these nine cases might just as well have been due to clerical error. Not one of these cited reports occurred in Indiana.
Huckabee put him in his place. The liberal media deliberately lies and she pointed it out. As a result, the "journalist" starting crying.
It can't be worse than 8 years of Obama.
But the reporter from Playboy ended up looking like a whiny fool.
Awwwww a butthurt Trumpanzee! Slither back to Stormfront, honey.
Actually honey, I can see your activity on sites I moderate. It's no wonder you're banned on them.
Blocked and likely to be banned here too. Adios.
Which proves my point about liberals and their intolerance for differing views. It's not like the double standards of liberal moderators is a secret. Liberal moderators ban people for an opposing view or posting facts that conflict with their agenda(s).
I also like the hypocrisy you employ on forums you do not moderate. You will attack and insult people relentlessly, but you get upset if someone does it to you or another liberal in return.
Really? What is the name of this cable news station?
Hillary's email incident was illegal. How are you not aware of that? You are upset about claims against Hillary being unproven, but you go on to call Trump a racist, which hasn't been proven. Speculation, bias, hate, opinion and insults are not proof.
The better person won.
Can you list anything bad that Trump has done while president? I ask people this all of the time, but they come empty. Usually all they do is hide behind insults.
What is it that liberals have against voter ID laws?
It could be worse, Hillary or Sanders could have won. That would have been disastrous.
Awesome. The liberals fell for it again. Trump pulls the strings and the liberals dance.
Voter ID laws are simply voter suppression. The GNoP can't win fair and square - demographics are destiny and the dinosaur party is on the way out. So it gerrymanders voting districts, purges legitimate voters from the rolls, and pushes racists Voter ID laws to try to cling to power. It will fail.
As for disastrous - the Trumpster Fire rages on.
Actually, voter ID laws are to ensure votes are legal and accurate. Anyone can obtain one of the multiple IDs required to vote. So how exactly is it suppression when anyone can obtain an ID?
Doesn't it make sense to show a valid ID? You need an ID to drive, open a bank account, get a job, buy a gun, purchase a house/car, go to college and so forth... Are they suppressing people who want these aforementioned items?
"purges legitimate voters from the rolls"
Don't these legitimate voters have IDs? If not, then why don't they get one?
"pushes racists Voter ID laws"
There is nothing racist about them. All races can obtain one of the IDs required to vote.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
The time magazine cover framed and hung in one of Cheeto-assholes golf clubs is actually a fake. Cheeto-ego has these fake magazine covers produced (and paid for by his fake charity, you know? the one New York shut down), as ego masturbation. Hence my amusement. Liberals pull the strings and Trumpanzees fail to see the snark and parody every time. Sadly, most of the time,the gap toothed, mouth breathing idiots who follow the orange sex offender don't even know when they are being scammed. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
I didn't say it wasn't fake. The liberals are all upset over a meaningless poster on his property.
Fake charity? You mean like the Clinton Foundation?
Sex offender? You mean like Bill Clinton.
Trump is in your heads 24/7. All you people have are insults. "I know, I will refer to Trump as a Cheeto. That will show them. Victory is ours".
I recall liberals throwing quite the fit when Trump drove his golf cart onto his own green.
So what exactly has Trump done as president that is actually bad? I keep asking this question, but the liberals always go silent...or they hurl some insults.
"The Truth:" Purging voters from the rolls (for example, down in Florida, were legitimate voters were removed for crimes they might commit in the future) has nothing to do with ID's. If you aren't familiar with the consistent efforts by the Republican Party to cage voters, you should be.
http://news.yahoo.com/tough...
http://www.miamiherald.com/...
www.brennancenter.org, June 26, 2007, "Reported Instances of Voter Caging" by Justin Levitt and Andrea Allison
http://news.yahoo.com/ufo-s...
http://www.nationalmemo.com...
Excellent links:
http://thinkprogress.org/el...
including
http://thinkprogress.org/ju...
http://news.yahoo.com/gops-...
http://www.miamibeach411.co...
http://nomadicpolitics.blog...
http://www.thenation.com/bl...
A series of laws passed in the past year by Ohio's Republican state legislature and Gov. John Kasich have waived the last three days of in-person early voting before Election Day for all but members of the military. Civilians now have until Friday, Nov. 2,to cast those ballots and must arrive at the booth before 6 p.m.
Republicans faulted the extra time for civilians as too costly for local governments and prone to fraud and abuse. Meanwhile, service members were exempt from the restrictions, allowing them to vote at any time before polls close, an extra three days without restrictions.
As previously reported by ABC News, the Obama campaign sued the Buckeye State last month to block those laws from taking effect, restoring weekend voting as it was in 2008. Democrats say those last days before Nov. 6 give a crucial extra cushion for Americans who might not have had the opportunity to enter the voting booth in the days prior. If the challenge is successful, they say, military voters would not see any difference in their rights.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs...
The notion that President Obama -- or any other rational politician -- would seek to curtail the right to vote of servicemen and women is absurd. Yet Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney peddled that canard in an attempt to win votes in this critical battleground state. Ohio voters weres too savvy to fall for such nonsense.
Voting by people who aren't eligible simply isn't a problem. The proposed "cure" is far worse than the disease.
2.0:
We finally have what appears to be a verified case of voter fraud by impersonation. The accused is a Republican (go figure!). And since it involves an absentee ballot, it isn’t at all clear to me how requiring an ID would have prevented this from happening.
http://www.nationalmemo.com...
In briefing filed with the Supreme Court in the Crawford v. Marion County Election Board case, the State of Indiana and several of its allied amici again fail to justify Indiana’s photo ID law.
They recite various examples of problems that the challenged law would not solve. They fail, however, to provide any evidence that in-person impersonation fraud — the only misconduct that photo ID rules could possibly prevent — is a problem, let alone one justifying the burdens of a restrictive photo ID rule.
In these submissions, it is easy to get distracted by noise. The briefs — submitted by the State of Indiana, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Attorney Generals of nine states, a national political party, members of Congress, various election officials, and several nonprofit organizations —contain more than 250 citations to reports of election problems.
But not one of the sources cited shows proof of a vote that Indiana’s law could prevent. That is, not one of the citations offered by Indiana or its allies refers to a proven example of a single vote cast at the polls in someone else’s name that could be stopped by a pollsite photo ID rule.
Even including suspected but unproven reports of fraud, the State and its allies have uncovered remarkably little evidence of any misconduct that Indiana’s law could prevent. Out of almost 400 million votes cast in general elections alone since 2000, the briefs cite one attempt at impersonation that was thwarted without a photo ID requirement, and nine unresolved cases where impersonation fraud at the polls was suspected but not proven.3 Nine possible examples out of hundreds of millions — and these nine cases might just as well have been due to clerical error. Not one of these cited reports occurred in Indiana.
http://brennan.3cdn.net/45b...
For more on Republican voter caging, see:
www.brennancenter.org, June 26, 2007, "Reported Instances of Voter Caging" by Justin Levitt and Andrea Allison