Just another routine reminder to you filthy fuckaducks that the rules remain in effect. You don't need to say anything nice about Charlie Kirk. There isn't much nice to be said, but you are not allowed to call for violence against others. we do not allow that shit, ever.
As for whether you want to exult over his murder, I'd call that pretty fucking gross, and remind you that rightwingers are highly likely to be cherry-picking comments on progressive sites for evidence that "the left" must be eliminated.
I'm a wacked out fuckabilly. I had to issue a very sternly worded (some allcaps sections) response to some shit people were posting on a conservative friend's post. I basically dared them to go to a country where people think its fun to shoot their fellow countrymen, and see if its really fun. Plot twist: it's not fun. edit: the right wing people looking for content are going to find quite a lot. The quips and one-liners on ______ are pretty wild, I will be honest...
As always, whenever someone I don't necessarily think is going to the Good Place has shed their mortal coil, my wish for them is this: May they find the afterlife they deserve.
Charlie held some beliefs that were kind of messed up, but I think he was actually sincere in them. Wasn't just in it for the fame and money or to please Trump More than can be said for many others.
I do not see any prohibition here about honoring Charlie Kirk's memory with the same rhetorical firewood he so liberally used during his sad sojourn here on this mortal coil. It would be a Viking funeral that Charlie would approve of.
RWNJs cherry picking our comments for evidence of our vile and heinous evil nature would be an improvement upon their normal standard operating procedure. Ever since Joseph McCarthy first baited his first pinko the standard conservative tactic has been to MAKE IT ALL COMPLETELY UP and then have corporate media shills do all the rest of the heavy lifting. The internet has only sped the process up and made it more efficient.
In the course of a busy life rich in horrors, I have learned to self-censor myself online to maintain a working relationship with other people. However, I find myself at times provoked into releasing my Inner Bastard and saying the wrong things.
At times like this, I need to cool my rage and rules help curb my darker impulses.
I don’t exult in anyone’s murder, ever. Violence is inherently destabilizing and the online far right has been flirting with disaster since they went all in for Trumpist terrorism.
I don’t expect them to change direction now that it’s claimed one of their own, because none of them want to wear the responsibility. They will continue screeching about “the Left!!1!!1” instead of looking in the mirror.
This is not a pushback - I agree with both Dok's principles and strategic thinking here - just an observation:
When discussing the death of an enemy, the line between acknowledging their toxicity and suggesting/acknowledging that the world just might be a better place without them in it, and "celebrating" or "exulting in" their death, can be bright and clear in theory but wide and fuzzy in practice. Especially to outsiders eager to find conspiracy and malice in a humble forum such as ours.
When I first happened on the news of that hateful little turd's demise, my first thought was that it was too good to be true. I have a long list of similar assholes who need to leave the stage, too, whether stage left or stage right, who cares.
I remember in imagined lives past, looking at windrows of fallen enemies and feeling nothing. Neither gladness nor hate nor compassion. Just relief it was all over and a profound weariness in mind and body. I'd like to think I'd feel compassion now after fifty yrs of meditation. It is the appropriate response.
This reminds me of one of my father's old jokes: A boy is loitering in a train station. A man comes up and asks how to catch the train to Chicago. The boy replies, "Well, sir... Turn left and you'll be right." The man, annoyed, replied, "What kind of crap is that?" The boy went on, "Well, sir... turn right and you'll be left."
Sure, he was an extreme right, pathologically lying, evil, white "Christian" supremacist/nationalist bigot who promoted and incited hate and violence, but at the end he leaned left.
Some Youths walked by whining about Communist Cambridge and Socialist Somerville. They are going to find the People's Republic of Massachusetts an interesting place to live...
The 4 minute "statement" from the orange occupant is now speculated to have been massaged by AI, as during his appearance today at the 9/11 memorial services, it's very clear he's had a stroke recently and half his face is attempting to escape the fur on his hair.
Trump and his MAGA supporters are mad as hell that Kirk died a gruesome violent death before thousands of college students in Utah. They’re going nuts on Fox and social media blaming “the radical left “ and swearing revenge. So one of their more rabid lieutenants was gunned down and what? Those who despise Trump and the MAGA Republicans and everything they stand for caused Kirk’s demise? Really isn’t that a bit of a stretch? Most Americans had no idea who he was and Democrats have other issues to protest like the monstrous tax breaks for billionaires and cuts to health insurance for poor Americans. Hey MAGA, sorry your guy was killed but get a life. This is America. Gun violence is as American as apple pie.
they should be celebrating his life instead of mourning and threatening non-fans.
When I die. I put money aside for a big party for my friends of which many friends and relatives have pre-deceased me so maybe I can spend some of that money now.
but back to the topic.
they should have a big party. it is not everyone who can become a symbol of their own words. He said that to die so that people can still have guns is not a big cost, so he gets to be one of the small costs and not worry people about carrying arms. By mourning so loudly, his friends are almost robbing him of this cost value and, as a result. may cost others of some of their gun rights..
Ta, Dok. I have great respect for The Rules. I have zero respect for Charlie Kirk, none for his followers, and less than none for that loser Chaya Raichik. Not only is she a gender traitor and a shanda in her role as wannabe kapo. She has the nerve to call herself by half of my Hebrew name. She doesn't deserve it. Out of respect for the rules for radicals, I shall not say what it is I think she does deserve.
I suppose it's too soon to suggest that we need to do something about all the guns and the ease with which people who shouldn't have access to guns can get them, right?
I mean, we wouldn't want to politicize this tragedy.
Maybe we wouldn't have compared Charlie to a Nazi if he didn't walk and talk like one. This is karma at its most obvious. And as for capturing the killer, I'm going to guess that person is no longer in the US, perhaps not in either the northern or western hemispheres. From what I have read, the shooter must have been a highly skilled rifleman (or woman), who likely used a very sophisticated weapon and siting system to be able to hit the target so precisely, Kirk's carotid artery, from 200 yards. There are some rumors of a professional hit. Even yesterday after early reports of the killing my spidey sense was tingling. Certain very powerful people are under intense scrutiny for sexual abuse and rape (allegedly) of minor female children. These very powerful people would like to get the attention off of their alleged crimes and they have the money to make that happen. What they needed was something big enough to divert that attention. I believe these people would have no hesitation to sacrifice one of their own most prominent supporters to achieve their end. They would put the sacrificial lamb up to his/her/their followers as a martyr for the cause. The actual perpetrator would be very well paid and guaranteed a never found safe harbor. The powerful people might then arrange for a faithful follower to somehow be caught, accused, tried, and convicted. The follower would accept this because he/she, too, would be paid a handsome sum, and promised an early release, maybe in the form of a "daring escape". However, the follower should not get comfortable because the powerful people know the follower can blow an incredibly horrible story wide open and take the powerful down. The follower may never be able to spend the money he got for his own action. I know this seems a far-fetched, but I put nothing below these powerful people. I believe they have done this sort of thing before and would have no restraint in doing it again to protect their money, their power, and their freedom from justice.
Meanwhile, Russia violates Polish airspace and NATO article 4 invoked, but our media can't shut up about the demise of some large-gummed influencer type famous for calling certain women of color DEI hires.
Just another routine reminder to you filthy fuckaducks that the rules remain in effect. You don't need to say anything nice about Charlie Kirk. There isn't much nice to be said, but you are not allowed to call for violence against others. we do not allow that shit, ever.
https://www.wonkette.com/p/rules-for-commenting-radicals
As for whether you want to exult over his murder, I'd call that pretty fucking gross, and remind you that rightwingers are highly likely to be cherry-picking comments on progressive sites for evidence that "the left" must be eliminated.
I'm a wacked out fuckabilly. I had to issue a very sternly worded (some allcaps sections) response to some shit people were posting on a conservative friend's post. I basically dared them to go to a country where people think its fun to shoot their fellow countrymen, and see if its really fun. Plot twist: it's not fun. edit: the right wing people looking for content are going to find quite a lot. The quips and one-liners on ______ are pretty wild, I will be honest...
As always, whenever someone I don't necessarily think is going to the Good Place has shed their mortal coil, my wish for them is this: May they find the afterlife they deserve.
Charlie held some beliefs that were kind of messed up, but I think he was actually sincere in them. Wasn't just in it for the fame and money or to please Trump More than can be said for many others.
It was grift pure and simple.
TPUSA is a multi-million dollar fundraising machine. Not bad for a college dropout with corporate sponsors.
ima give it a shot. charlie kirk had more hair and was a better person overall than stephen miller. that wasn't so hard.
Taller, also too.
I'm with you until "more hair".
They pursued the same goals
https://drwilliamhorne.substack.com/p/why-we-pretend
That was honest. The talking heads empathy ignores history and what the USofA is.
so then, just a less unfortunate hairline?
Just read the the piece, sir
lol
"So where can I get a 'piece?"
- balding Travis Bickle
I offered my "tots and pears" yesterday and was promptly labeled a "Crisis Asshole". I think that should be my next tattoo.
I think you'll appreciate this piece
https://drwilliamhorne.substack.com/p/why-we-pretend
" I Got the Rectocranial Inversion Blues" Single from debut album release of the same name.
Is Speculative Conspiracy Theory 101 allowed?
I do not see any prohibition here about honoring Charlie Kirk's memory with the same rhetorical firewood he so liberally used during his sad sojourn here on this mortal coil. It would be a Viking funeral that Charlie would approve of.
RWNJs cherry picking our comments for evidence of our vile and heinous evil nature would be an improvement upon their normal standard operating procedure. Ever since Joseph McCarthy first baited his first pinko the standard conservative tactic has been to MAKE IT ALL COMPLETELY UP and then have corporate media shills do all the rest of the heavy lifting. The internet has only sped the process up and made it more efficient.
If we didn't make nasty comments the right would just make some up anyway.
The gap between what we do and what they say we do is growing by the hour
Thanks for the reminder, Dok.
Is it *really* necessary, though?
I mean -- really??
https://drwilliamhorne.substack.com/p/why-we-pretend
In the course of a busy life rich in horrors, I have learned to self-censor myself online to maintain a working relationship with other people. However, I find myself at times provoked into releasing my Inner Bastard and saying the wrong things.
At times like this, I need to cool my rage and rules help curb my darker impulses.
Well, people have been seen in the parking lot doing a dance called "Chunk Kirk's bumpstick boogie."
Ok, that was just me, but I was also warming up for BLACK SABBATH, THE BALLET.
I LURVE Black Sabbath, the Ballet.
We shouldn't need it, but there you are.
I don't think we really do need it
I am, however, in the minority both literally and figuratively
But I'm thrilled that Professor William Horne not only agrees with me, but articulates why better than I can at this juncture
https://drwilliamhorne.substack.com/p/why-we-pretend
Qanon clown
I don’t exult in anyone’s murder, ever. Violence is inherently destabilizing and the online far right has been flirting with disaster since they went all in for Trumpist terrorism.
I don’t expect them to change direction now that it’s claimed one of their own, because none of them want to wear the responsibility. They will continue screeching about “the Left!!1!!1” instead of looking in the mirror.
This is not a pushback - I agree with both Dok's principles and strategic thinking here - just an observation:
When discussing the death of an enemy, the line between acknowledging their toxicity and suggesting/acknowledging that the world just might be a better place without them in it, and "celebrating" or "exulting in" their death, can be bright and clear in theory but wide and fuzzy in practice. Especially to outsiders eager to find conspiracy and malice in a humble forum such as ours.
So we shouldn't drag Hector's body through the quad?
When I first happened on the news of that hateful little turd's demise, my first thought was that it was too good to be true. I have a long list of similar assholes who need to leave the stage, too, whether stage left or stage right, who cares.
They've been calling for our violent elimination; they don't need an excuse.
I remember in imagined lives past, looking at windrows of fallen enemies and feeling nothing. Neither gladness nor hate nor compassion. Just relief it was all over and a profound weariness in mind and body. I'd like to think I'd feel compassion now after fifty yrs of meditation. It is the appropriate response.
Wait ... 𝘸𝘦'𝘳𝘦 the Left? Who knew?
This reminds me of one of my father's old jokes: A boy is loitering in a train station. A man comes up and asks how to catch the train to Chicago. The boy replies, "Well, sir... Turn left and you'll be right." The man, annoyed, replied, "What kind of crap is that?" The boy went on, "Well, sir... turn right and you'll be left."
I'm the radical left!
I'M the radical left!
In the eyes of the reich, anybody to the left of Sean Hannity is radical left.
I'm the radical left, and so's my wife!
I'm just sinister.
I'm the leftist of all!
If I get any further left I'll be on the right
no horseshoes, please
Today, I feel like the redacted left.
🙂
I definitely feel like I have been left.
Mood...
“We’re the lefties?”
I *am* a leftie.
Oh, me too.
Same!
^^s for rather oblique Mitchell And Webb reference.
Mr. Beam, you're a blackguard, a liar, a hypocrite and a stench in the nostrils of honest men.
McCawber!
Sure, he was an extreme right, pathologically lying, evil, white "Christian" supremacist/nationalist bigot who promoted and incited hate and violence, but at the end he leaned left.
Second time I’ve stumbled onto your feed . Second time I’ve determined you to be a complete idiot. Well done
That sounds like a you problem. "Stumbled" is doing a lot of work in your complaint, Billy.
Interesting that he was shot under a tent that said, “prove me wrong.” Guess someone decided to take him up on it.
"Hey, wait a minute! Second Amendment soultions are only supposed to apply to librulz!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Some Youths walked by whining about Communist Cambridge and Socialist Somerville. They are going to find the People's Republic of Massachusetts an interesting place to live...
The 4 minute "statement" from the orange occupant is now speculated to have been massaged by AI, as during his appearance today at the 9/11 memorial services, it's very clear he's had a stroke recently and half his face is attempting to escape the fur on his hair.
Trump and his MAGA supporters are mad as hell that Kirk died a gruesome violent death before thousands of college students in Utah. They’re going nuts on Fox and social media blaming “the radical left “ and swearing revenge. So one of their more rabid lieutenants was gunned down and what? Those who despise Trump and the MAGA Republicans and everything they stand for caused Kirk’s demise? Really isn’t that a bit of a stretch? Most Americans had no idea who he was and Democrats have other issues to protest like the monstrous tax breaks for billionaires and cuts to health insurance for poor Americans. Hey MAGA, sorry your guy was killed but get a life. This is America. Gun violence is as American as apple pie.
they should be celebrating his life instead of mourning and threatening non-fans.
When I die. I put money aside for a big party for my friends of which many friends and relatives have pre-deceased me so maybe I can spend some of that money now.
but back to the topic.
they should have a big party. it is not everyone who can become a symbol of their own words. He said that to die so that people can still have guns is not a big cost, so he gets to be one of the small costs and not worry people about carrying arms. By mourning so loudly, his friends are almost robbing him of this cost value and, as a result. may cost others of some of their gun rights..
So celebrate his life, not his death.
Ta, Dok. I have great respect for The Rules. I have zero respect for Charlie Kirk, none for his followers, and less than none for that loser Chaya Raichik. Not only is she a gender traitor and a shanda in her role as wannabe kapo. She has the nerve to call herself by half of my Hebrew name. She doesn't deserve it. Out of respect for the rules for radicals, I shall not say what it is I think she does deserve.
JD Vance traveled with Charlie Kirk's casket on Air Force 2 today. Vance said that the cushions and silk linings of the casket were nice fucking.
My too early call is the Trump admin will never tell us who did it.
Take your pick:
- they're too incompetent to find them
- the person falls in their lap and their politics would hurt rather than help.
I suppose it's too soon to suggest that we need to do something about all the guns and the ease with which people who shouldn't have access to guns can get them, right?
I mean, we wouldn't want to politicize this tragedy.
Kirk personally lobbied to make sure that both open and concealed carry are permitted on college campuses in Utah.
They did say the shooter blended in on campus.
Enjoy your time in hell, Charlie. And not the good Hell with all the cool stoners and adulterers and such.
Charlie was A-OK for the 2A. Now Dems need to push for "the Charlie Kirk Memorial Gun Safety Act" -- so the GOP can vote against it. 'Nuff said.
Maybe we wouldn't have compared Charlie to a Nazi if he didn't walk and talk like one. This is karma at its most obvious. And as for capturing the killer, I'm going to guess that person is no longer in the US, perhaps not in either the northern or western hemispheres. From what I have read, the shooter must have been a highly skilled rifleman (or woman), who likely used a very sophisticated weapon and siting system to be able to hit the target so precisely, Kirk's carotid artery, from 200 yards. There are some rumors of a professional hit. Even yesterday after early reports of the killing my spidey sense was tingling. Certain very powerful people are under intense scrutiny for sexual abuse and rape (allegedly) of minor female children. These very powerful people would like to get the attention off of their alleged crimes and they have the money to make that happen. What they needed was something big enough to divert that attention. I believe these people would have no hesitation to sacrifice one of their own most prominent supporters to achieve their end. They would put the sacrificial lamb up to his/her/their followers as a martyr for the cause. The actual perpetrator would be very well paid and guaranteed a never found safe harbor. The powerful people might then arrange for a faithful follower to somehow be caught, accused, tried, and convicted. The follower would accept this because he/she, too, would be paid a handsome sum, and promised an early release, maybe in the form of a "daring escape". However, the follower should not get comfortable because the powerful people know the follower can blow an incredibly horrible story wide open and take the powerful down. The follower may never be able to spend the money he got for his own action. I know this seems a far-fetched, but I put nothing below these powerful people. I believe they have done this sort of thing before and would have no restraint in doing it again to protect their money, their power, and their freedom from justice.
Charlie called for the release of the Epstein files 2 months ago. Make of that what you will.
Meanwhile, Russia violates Polish airspace and NATO article 4 invoked, but our media can't shut up about the demise of some large-gummed influencer type famous for calling certain women of color DEI hires.