"But the brown strychnine has been cut with acid. So, watch it. If you want to do half and see what happens and then do the other half, that's up to you."
There has to be a way science(Science!) can quantify why it is that all these gop pricks who get up and spout this crap all have a face that even Ghandi would see and want to grab a stick and start whaling on them.
I'm trying to wrap my head around Evan Hurst's argument. I think it goes like this:
A. Senator Tom Cotton is an idiot.B. Senator Tom Cotton believes the Iran deal is a bad deal.C. Anyone who agrees with Tom Cotton must be an idiot.D. Therefore, if you agree that the Iran deal is a bad deal, then you, too, must be an idiot. Q.E.D.
You have to love the logic(al fallacies) of liberal progressives. Why raise any substantive defense on the merits of this Iran deal when you can simply wage an ad hominem attack on some random Republican who thinks otherwise?
Talks to throttle their nuke development were ongoing until the incoming Cheney administration decided to "get tough" and walk away from the negotiations. So now NK has nuclear weapons.
Unfortunately, it's just the right size to support stupid.
Big paydays for defense contractors.
"But the brown strychnine has been cut with acid. So, watch it. If you want to do half and see what happens and then do the other half, that's up to you."
Stop picking your nose!
You're supposed to stuff the ether-soaked rag along he floor boards with the vents open so it blows in your face while you're driving.
Well, I see ole deep throat is back making noise again.
Well those boll weevils are going to starve to death.
You always can end up catching a bad bit. Usually thieves are involved. Usually love don't love nobody.
Magic Kindergarten is too good for him...
He will never be able to fool us like Ann Colter did.
There has to be a way science(Science!) can quantify why it is that all these gop pricks who get up and spout this crap all have a face that even Ghandi would see and want to grab a stick and start whaling on them.
I'm trying to wrap my head around Evan Hurst's argument. I think it goes like this:
A. Senator Tom Cotton is an idiot.B. Senator Tom Cotton believes the Iran deal is a bad deal.C. Anyone who agrees with Tom Cotton must be an idiot.D. Therefore, if you agree that the Iran deal is a bad deal, then you, too, must be an idiot. Q.E.D.
You have to love the logic(al fallacies) of liberal progressives. Why raise any substantive defense on the merits of this Iran deal when you can simply wage an ad hominem attack on some random Republican who thinks otherwise?
Oh, I get it. You support the Iran deal in order to spite the faces of GOP politicians.
Pencil-necked glop of shit.
Oh, just look away, dixie lamb.
North Korea also too.
Talks to throttle their nuke development were ongoing until the incoming Cheney administration decided to "get tough" and walk away from the negotiations. So now NK has nuclear weapons.