Big news, everyone: The Senate did a thing! But wait, there's even bigger news than that. The Senate did a thing onclimate change. Kind of. Sort of. In a way. A symbolic non-binding basically meaningless way. But still! Are you confused? Confounded? Downright what-the-effed? Laughing so hard because this might some kind of, well, hoax? It is not a hoax. On Wednesday, the Senate voted on
I'm not a Senator, but the evidence seems to indicate that the Senate is largely a steaming pile of sycophants due to the inappropriate influence of money and religion, so I guess I have to acknowledge that the Senate exists.
So basically, this is one of those sentences that sounds cool until you parse it, and then becomes kinda ambiguous? Okay, here are two more: <em> &quot;I cannot think more highly of this Congress!&quot;
&quot;No one is better than this Congress.&quot;</em>
<i>their Republican pals in the House, who maintain that so-called &ldquo;climatologists&rdquo; are just greedy bastards totally faking it to protect their get-rich-quick racket . . .</i>
Have these guys heard of psychological projection?
Will the Senate vote that the speed of light is an absolute limit in nature? Or will they say <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michelson&ndash\;Morley_experiment" target="_blank">Michelson-Morley&#039;s</a>? results were a hoax?
Will they vote that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old? Or will they say that is a hoax perpetrated by the radiometric dating industry (for grant money)?
I&#039;m not a Senator, but the evidence seems to indicate that the Senate is largely a steaming pile of sycophants due to the inappropriate influence of money and religion, so I guess I have to acknowledge that the Senate exists.
Of all the productive things the congress could be doing we catch them at a circle jerk... again.
Eppur si muove, bitchez!
Never have so many worked so hard to do so little.
So basically, this is one of those sentences that sounds cool until you parse it, and then becomes kinda ambiguous? Okay, here are two more: <em> &quot;I cannot think more highly of this Congress!&quot;
&quot;No one is better than this Congress.&quot;</em>
You mean &quot;slow&quot; as a euphemism, right? If so, I agree with you. Can&#039;t get much &quot;slower&quot;.
&ldquo;Biblical evidence&rdquo;?
<i>their Republican pals in the House, who maintain that so-called &ldquo;climatologists&rdquo; are just greedy bastards totally faking it to protect their get-rich-quick racket . . .</i>
Have these guys heard of psychological projection?
<i>This is what the Senate considers &#039;progress&#039;</i>
Weighting the pros and cons, I expect little <i>pro</i>gress from <i>Con</i>gress.
Military intelligence?
There&#039;s a song about it and everything, so it must be real. Feh. Stupid work computer has blocked the You Tube link.
Well, it does have electrolytes... And what plants crave...
Hey this is a fun game!
Will the Senate vote that the speed of light is an absolute limit in nature? Or will they say <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michelson&ndash\;Morley_experiment" target="_blank">Michelson-Morley&#039;s</a>? results were a hoax?
Will they vote that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old? Or will they say that is a hoax perpetrated by the radiometric dating industry (for grant money)?
Who in God&#039;s Name (The One who Changes Climates) would even click on that?!
Inhofe <i>was there??</i>
He certainly could pass for a really old lizard.
Also if you&#039;re not a Bishop, a Pope, or an Angel, how can you speak about what God does and doesn&#039;t do to the climate?
What proof do you have other than a very old book that contradicts even basic planetary realities?
Civilized people should not base governance on myths and superstitions. LIKE THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID PRETTY DAMN CLEARLY