16 Comments
User's avatar
Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

so would lots of people- unfortunately, none of the party leadership

Lefty Mark's avatar

Ask the Framers. The Senate is that way by design. It was designed to act as a brake on the House in order to keep it from flying off the rails. The Framers wanted representative democracy but were fearful of mob rule.

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

It's just a ploy to distract us from the keystone XL capitulation and the chained CPI sellout that are already being scheduled for the lame duck session. Because surrendering is what they do best...

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

Malcolm Forbes?

(actually, these days he'd be draped over the saddlebags while his idiot son drives the bike into a brick wall)

schmannity's avatar

Schumer reform Wall Street? Someone better run this by Elizabeth Warren.

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

But how are craven Dems supposed to beg for table scraps from Wall Street with her in charge?

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

BUT IT WILL CREATE ELEVENTY TRILLION JERBS!@!!1!

Zippy W. Pinhead's avatar

She'll pick Joe Lieberman

Msgr MΩment classic ☑️'s avatar

Lady Godiva's great great great great...... granddaughter?

Msgr MΩment classic ☑️'s avatar

That is one biker chick that won't be sitting on OHJB's lap.

Spotts1701, Taking Bible Guns's avatar

Does she get a Hammer of Loving Correction too?

Fitzgerald Chesterfield's avatar

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Maybe the dems can use that line.

Fitzgerald Chesterfield's avatar

<a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Declaration_of_Independence_\(Trumbull\)" target="_blank">John Trumbull?</a>