Ever since funny Nevada Senate candidate-lady Sharron Angle talked about how government entitlement programs violate the First Commandment by promoting "idolatry," she's been trying to clarify what she meant by that, exactly. But did she even say it in the first place? Today's Sharron Angle says no -- er, well, like, yesterday's Sharron Angle didn't mean what you
After she won the nomination, Ms. Angle removed her website. Harry Ried's crew thoughtfully put it back up ("RealSharonAngle.com").
Off-the-Mark Levin claims Ms. Angle never said she wanted to get rid of Social Security. She just wants to change how it is funded. Whiskey Tango Foxtwat?
You can read her own words for yourself. She just wants to privitize Social Security, or something like that...I mean come on, that's not exactly wanting to get rid of it.
If Ms Angle and her co-religionists don't want to idolize the government by taking entitlement money, they can just say "no". More for me.
After she won the nomination, Ms. Angle removed her website. Harry Ried's crew thoughtfully put it back up ("RealSharonAngle.com").
Off-the-Mark Levin claims Ms. Angle never said she wanted to get rid of Social Security. She just wants to change how it is funded. Whiskey Tango Foxtwat?
You can read her own words for yourself. She just wants to privitize Social Security, or something like that...I mean come on, that's not exactly wanting to get rid of it.
Is it?
You interview with the ideas you have, not the ideas you wish you had. Or wish you didn't have, as this case illustrates.
Eeeesh. What kind of dressing would you like on your word salad?
Time for a shot of Patrón and a long nap.
If Ms Angle and her co-religionists don't want to idolize the government by taking entitlement money, they can just say "no". More for me.
Freakin, tweakin and peakin.
Forreal.