In today's "You're sure this isn't from National Report? " news -- because it sounds like bullshit, but isn't witty enough to be from The Onion -- we have this story out of South Carolina, where voters in several cities were asked some perfectly reasonable questions as part of an exit poll Tuesday. Four of the questions touched on race and slavery; respondents were asked to "agree" or "disagree" with these statements:
"There never really was a man from Nantucket"
I think you may be wrong here because I know for a fact that his shwantz was so long he could suck it. Although, it was a very sad story that did not end well for the man, because of where he decided to tuck it and of course what the police later found in the bucket.
I miss Pryor. We needed him around to cut thru the ludicrous BS that the wingnuts have been throwing at Bams because of Preznitting while Blah. I can only imagine and fall short of how amazing he would have been with this material to work with.
I was in Wal-mart (hangs head in shame) and noticed bags of cotton balls on the shelf. So I picked one up. I'm a cotton picker! And I have the selfie to prove it.
Stating that you conducted your "survey" in order to prove a contentious political point kind of undermines its validity, no? Or even reveals it as nothing more than a polemical tool? Because bias, cherry-picking, begging the question, etc. IOW, this survey's results are worth less than the pixels used to display them.
Teatards will gladly look beyond race if a candidate is derpy enough. But if not, they reserve the right to pass around photoshops of said candidate/elected official as a witch doctor and watermelon joke. It's not racist because something.
I am shocked to learn that conservative hacks have a place in such academic exemplars as Clemson and Auburn.
Sure, but Clemson also has some of the finest academic minds...in South Carolina.
Like commenting.
"There never really was a man from Nantucket"
I think you may be wrong here because I know for a fact that his shwantz was so long he could suck it. Although, it was a very sad story that did not end well for the man, because of where he decided to tuck it and of course what the police later found in the bucket.
This is a trick answer, right?
My god.
"Woodard said he was trying to prove that race has no bearing on whether whites vote for political candidates."
A poll designed to prove a pre-conceived (and profoundly wrong) conclusion? What could possibly go wrong?
"“The people of West Virginia spoke with a sure and strong voice that they desire a different direction for our state.”
And then the candidate they elected switched parties. Problem solved, GOP-style.
Well, this guy got arrested, so there is a difference.
Some of America's most brilliant leaders, guided by Woodard's rigorous, highly scientific data. Or not.
I miss Pryor. We needed him around to cut thru the ludicrous BS that the wingnuts have been throwing at Bams because of Preznitting while Blah. I can only imagine and fall short of how amazing he would have been with this material to work with.
<i>&quot;Dok Zoom is ... a rhetoric/composition PhD&quot;</i>
I assume they made you write your own diploma. Then graded it.
I was in Wal-mart (hangs head in shame) and noticed bags of cotton balls on the shelf. So I picked one up. I&#039;m a cotton picker! And I have the selfie to prove it.
That&#039;s some mighty fine research ya done there Nixon_So_Fine.
Stating that you conducted your &quot;survey&quot; in order to prove a contentious political point kind of undermines its validity, no? Or even reveals it as nothing more than a polemical tool? Because bias, cherry-picking, begging the question, etc. IOW, this survey&#039;s results are worth less than the pixels used to display them.
Teatards will gladly look beyond race if a candidate is derpy enough. But if not, they reserve the right to pass around photoshops of said candidate/elected official as a witch doctor and watermelon joke. It&#039;s not racist because something.