14 Comments

Wonder if they'll ever find out that the real problem is: the message doesn't always stop at the other thing. Sometimes it goes viral and the whole world finds out that you got prank-called by someone pretending to be Nicholas Sarkozy.

Expand full comment

Every Supreme Court Justice knows you just tell the boy down to the Western Union you never got that there telly-gram.

Expand full comment

No I.T. degree needed, but a question or two during confirmation hearings would help. Like: "What is the packet format for a TCP/IP datagram?" Or "What was the original intent of port 8023?"

Trouble is these robe-ots stay on the court for an e-Ternity. Scalia made his bones about when Windows 1.0 was released. So we'll need to term-limit them to two releases of Mac OS.

Expand full comment

Can't be Thomas, because Scalia thinks it's witchcraft.

Roberts is your dead chicken guy, under the corporate dead chickens are speech doctrine.

Expand full comment

He doesn't have to with Clarance. He does such a good job on that "table" that he always wins a replay.

Expand full comment

They're split. 4 think it's magic, 4 think it's witchcraft and one thinks you use a dead chicken.

Expand full comment

SCOTUS pwned by QEII

Expand full comment

So does this imply that if I am Boss in Mafia Wars I could be subject to RICO statutes? Maybe I can be like Joe Miller, create a huge agribusiness on FarmVille and get me some huge Department of Agriculture grants.

Hooray I can be the ADM of Farmville!

Expand full comment

Where's Ted Stevens when you need him?

Expand full comment

Stop right there, Scalia! Do you really want Ruth Bader Ginsburg sexting you??

Expand full comment

23-skidoo!

Expand full comment

Why else would Scalia be shoving quarters in his ass for all of these years?

Expand full comment

It's better than heavy petting!

Expand full comment

Someone should tell him that "Friend" is really "Friend with Benefits". That should produce many rejections.

Expand full comment