241 Comments
User's avatar
sgt. jmk de la résistance's avatar

Isn't it mean of the Democrats to do that? I mean, Trey, et. al. had barely four years to look into Hillary's every move the night Benghazi happened. Why can't the Democrats have wrapped up investigating a vast and multi-year series of related events in a couple of months! UNFAIR!!

Expand full comment
chicken thief's avatar

A POTUS pardon only works for federal crimes. If Mueller hands his findings to, say, the NY AG, and he prosecutes then there are no pardons. Any of the financial stuff, or perjury related to the financials, could easily be prosecuted in NY.

Expand full comment
Cornelius Fussbudget's avatar

If I ever get in trouble, I can just say I'm planning to run for President the next year so I don't have to testify. Neener neener neener!

Expand full comment
bbayliss's avatar

Chin up...Like you I feel as though I'm under assault. I think things may get worse before they get better, but I think we'll get better. maybe try this?https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Expand full comment
cynmac sez Whar Boxes's avatar

Yeah, he can try that.

Expand full comment
Courser's avatar

OMG, there's a Fuck That App!

:::grabs phone:::

Thanks bbayliss!

Expand full comment
Her Wokedness, Sister Artemis's avatar

For me, pretty much every one of the last 435 days....

Expand full comment
Cletus Safari backs Ukraine's avatar

In that case, I hope Bannon has good security. I doubt Putin will stop at stitches for snitches.

Expand full comment
Rachel Book Harlot's avatar

I think he can plead the 5th.

Expand full comment
Mike Steele's avatar

Last line, true dat...however, Steverino is very much INSIDE the ratfuckery. Mercers/Cambridge/Bannon did most of the legwork to target Russian efforts on social media - and, likely, at polling places.

Expand full comment
Mike Steele's avatar

Actually, Gowdy resigned from Ethics Committee, after arranging exoneration of Dirty Devin, still-'recused', yet remarkably active chairman on HIC.

Expand full comment
Mike Steele's avatar

As of now, 'no grand jury; no grand jury - YOU'RE the grand jury!' Looks like Bannon's visit w/Mueller will simply be a cozy little fireside chat...maybe peppered with a little 'strong language'?

Expand full comment
motmelere's avatar

I'm starting to rethink my position on enhanced interrogation.

Expand full comment
ken_kukec's avatar

If he does, his lawyer will have to make a good-faith proffer to a judge demonstrating how his answers might tend to incriminate him. And even if he succeeds, Mueller can give him a grant of immunity and make him talk (thereby "cracking him like an egg," as someone once said).

Expand full comment
shivaskeeper's avatar

He can, and if it comes to it, her will. It's only a possible scenario though. I think it's going to go more like Nixon/Agnew. They are both going to resign before the charges come down.

Expand full comment
shivaskeeper's avatar

I get that. I also understand that Mueller is using the NY AG's office as his dead man switch. Schneiderman also knows it and is going along. Federal charges are better and carry more weight than state charges, but we'll take what we can get.

I think if the federal charges work, or at least the threat of federal charges, and they resign, it is possible NY will just let it go. Mission accomplished when they are out of power sort of thing.

I could be wrong, and time will tell.

Expand full comment