According to Justice Antonin Scalia, who will only rule on court cases involving robots if the Constitution lists the EXACT model number and specifications of said robot in the text, the Constitution is for men who happen to be heterosexual and NOBODY ELSE, so other humans should just "get over it." "Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex.
Isn't this argument of his the reason they tried to pass the ERA? Didn't many conservative opponents of it say it was unnecessary because women were covered by the 14th Amendment?
Actually, I'd like to see Picard's high dudgeon at this disrespect to the dignity of the Enterprise name. He'd be quoting Shakespeare and displaying the quiet fury of a severely disappointed father and old what's-his-repressed-gay-face would slink away in shame and regret. Kirk, on the other hand, would take tips on his next joke log entry, and Pike would just keep beeping twice.
This is just to deal with the whole let's get rid of the 14th Born Here Amendment and other tea bagger business. You got to keep moving around to follow these guys. That and he just might want to be President himself. No law that says he can't. I wouldn't put it past him after he screws up the rest of the laws for elections.
If there's one thing the TP'er hate more than activist judges who ignore "the plain language of the Constitution", it's the actual plain language of the Constitution.
Nothing in the Constitution says &quot;money is speech&quot;. So we <strike>democratically enacted a law</strike> rammed a mandate down Real Americans&trade; throats saying corporations can&#039;t make political contributions. Hooray! The Scalia system works. What? Citizens United? Huh?
And it only protects <i>white</i> men.
Isn&#039;t this argument of his the reason they tried to pass the ERA? Didn&#039;t many conservative opponents of it say it was unnecessary because women were covered by the 14th Amendment?
I&#039;m sorta beginning to agree they were smarter than SOME of us now.
But I think we can all agree w/ Scaly-Ass on one thing -- he&#039;s definitely been there too long.
Someone turned Scalia into a newt.
He didn&#039;t get better.
Caption the picture: Justice Scalia demonstrates the size of his asshole.
joke != fail
but howzabout: to scalia, to see women <strike>as persons</strike> is a broad interpretation of the 14th amendment.
Actually, I&#039;d like to see Picard&#039;s high dudgeon at this disrespect to the dignity of the Enterprise name. He&#039;d be quoting Shakespeare and displaying the quiet fury of a severely disappointed father and old what&#039;s-his-repressed-gay-face would slink away in shame and regret. Kirk, on the other hand, would take tips on his next joke log entry, and Pike would just keep beeping twice.
The wogs begin at Calais!
This is just to deal with the whole let&#039;s get rid of the 14th Born Here Amendment and other tea bagger business. You got to keep moving around to follow these guys. That and he just might want to be President himself. No law that says he can&#039;t. I wouldn&#039;t put it past him after he screws up the rest of the laws for elections.
Constitutions should have expiration dates.
Corporations are mostly run by men silly.
He was born in 1936, how much longer is this guy going to stay alive?
We need a time machine so I can see Thomas Jefferson horse whip Scalia for being an idiot.
If there&#039;s one thing the TP&#039;er hate more than activist judges who ignore &quot;the plain language of the Constitution&quot;, it&#039;s the actual plain language of the Constitution.
Nothing in the Constitution says &quot;money is speech&quot;. So we <strike>democratically enacted a law</strike> rammed a mandate down Real Americans&trade; throats saying corporations can&#039;t make political contributions. Hooray! The Scalia system works. What? Citizens United? Huh?
well i know for sure that ONE superannuated judge has been there too long imposing his demands on society.