OK, so here is some unambiguously nifty Nice Time for you: An Australian study of the children of same-sex couples, the largest yet conducted, finds that their kids aren't merely OK, but may be happier and healthier than children in the population at large. We have a feeling that this important research on families may not go over especially well at the "Family Research Council."
Evidently, if you want flowers or a cake for your corpse bride, it's OK for the shop owner to refuse. Assuming he has deeply-held religious beliefs on the topic, of course.
Actually, come to think of it . . . does the Bibble have anything to say about this issue? Proving your deeply held religious convictions might be a bit of a problem.
"Successful gay couples, and no guns . . . what a hellhole Australia has become!" -Brian A. Fissure
Who, by the way, recently excreted this fresh, steaming <a href="http:\/\/www.pinknews.co.uk\/2014\/07\/07\/bryan-fischer-we-discriminate-against-necrophilics-why-not-gays\/" target="_blank">pile of derp</a>.
Same sex couples know they&#039;re scrutinized more closely than hetero couples. Are we simply seeing the results of parents who try harder? (Take a note AFA it&#039;s the effort, not the gender.)
Someday the child of a same sex couple will commit a crime. And if the religious nuts&#039; prayers are answered, it will be a horrible mass rape, murder, satanic ritual. Imagine their rejoicing.
<i>We have a feeling that this important research on families may not go over especially well at the &ldquo;Family Research Council.&rdquo;</i>
Our intolerance is the good kind because shut up that&rsquo;s why.
&quot;We discriminate against necrophiliacs&quot;
Interesting bit of almost-self-awareness from a guy who fellates Jesus&#039; muscular wang.
Recycled lawyer joke. Makes for a pretty good Baptist joke, too.
Evidently, if you want flowers or a cake for your corpse bride, it&#039;s OK for the shop owner to refuse. Assuming he has deeply-held religious beliefs on the topic, of course.
Actually, come to think of it . . . does the Bibble have anything to say about this issue? Proving your deeply held religious convictions might be a bit of a problem.
Except for rape babbies, which are &quot;gifts from God.&quot;
The Xtard mind is a strange and twisty place.
In many religions, especially fundie ones, Reality = Heresy.
True in the days of Giordano Bruno, and still true today.
I&#039;m my own... wait, what?
You need one that goes to 11.
VB.
Yeah, big-time external validity issues using only Aussie subjects. I mean, the water goes down the drain backwards there!
&quot;Successful gay couples, and no guns . . . what a hellhole Australia has become!&quot; -Brian A. Fissure
Who, by the way, recently excreted this fresh, steaming <a href="http:\/\/www.pinknews.co.uk\/2014\/07\/07\/bryan-fischer-we-discriminate-against-necrophilics-why-not-gays\/" target="_blank">pile of derp</a>.
Family Research Council: Sure, who conducted the study, &quot;climate change scientists?&quot;
Same sex couples know they&#039;re scrutinized more closely than hetero couples. Are we simply seeing the results of parents who try harder? (Take a note AFA it&#039;s the effort, not the gender.)
Someday the child of a same sex couple will commit a crime. And if the religious nuts&#039; prayers are answered, it will be a horrible mass rape, murder, satanic ritual. Imagine their rejoicing.
You know it&#039;s tough being gay when your kids are bleeding at the wrists and ankles.
Oh, you said &quot;stigma.&quot; Never mind.
*sigh* Again with the comparing things that cannot consent to gay relationships.
Though if the dead <em>could</em> consent, we would have a slightly more pressing problem.
Bitter much?
<i>We have a feeling that this important research on families may not go over especially well at the &ldquo;Family Research Council.&rdquo;</i>
Our intolerance is the good kind because shut up that&rsquo;s why.