Since the conservative supremes have entered into a pack with Satan, they will essentially live forever. A daily session of Sucking Satan's Cock is like drinking from the Fountain of Youth. A horrible, horrible fountain of youth.
"In the realm of policy discussions the regular give-and-take of debate ought to be a context in which rancor or discord based on race are avoided, not invited. And if these factors are to be interjected, surely it ought not to be at the invitation or insistence of the courts."
Let's just be glad the fucker wasn't around to rule on Brown v. Board of Ed.
Calling either of them a "swing" vote is pretty over-optimistic.
Incidentally, the composition of the SCOTUS is my principle argument for folks who are upset that Bubba and O aren't really very liberal. Just think what the Court would look like without those two breaks in the Republican presidency.
Out here in California, we can re-animate our most bestest proposition evah, <a href="https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/California_Proposition_14_\(1964\)" target="_blank">Proposition 14!</a>
at one point during roberts&#039; confirmation hearings schumer said - with forced appreciation - &#039;god he&#039;s good&#039;
got total chills.
and it&#039;s been even worse than anticipated.
As long as it&#039;s not based on the car color.
Coming up: GOP governor seeking higher office persuades the people to have a referendum on making Christianism the official state religion?
Lawsplainers: Does this ruling allow that now?
Welcome to the Thunderdome, folks.
Since the conservative supremes have entered into a pack with Satan, they will essentially live forever. A daily session of Sucking Satan&#039;s Cock is like drinking from the Fountain of Youth. A horrible, horrible fountain of youth.
&quot;In the realm of policy discussions the regular give-and-take of debate ought to be a context in which rancor or discord based on race are avoided, not invited. And if these factors are to be interjected, surely it ought not to be at the invitation or insistence of the courts.&quot;
Let&#039;s just be glad the fucker wasn&#039;t around to rule on Brown v. Board of Ed.
So they&#039;ve been told.
I didn&#039;t know Mexico even had a navy.
I&#039;m sure a couple of them wonder if Dred Scott went the right way.
Calling either of them a &quot;swing&quot; vote is pretty over-optimistic.
Incidentally, the composition of the SCOTUS is my principle argument for folks who are upset that Bubba and O aren&#039;t really very liberal. Just think what the Court would look like without those two breaks in the Republican presidency.
So if voters pass a clearly unconstitutional law (like say, personhood begins at conception), it must be upheld because the voters approved it?
Justice Kennedy should not be taking lessons on how to develop a compromise decision from former Chief Justice Roger Taney.
SNARK MOB ROOL!!11!!
I hate this fucking country.
White <i>males,</i> puleeze!
Out here in California, we can re-animate our most bestest proposition evah, <a href="https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/California_Proposition_14_\(1964\)" target="_blank">Proposition 14!</a>
The Extreme Court was holding back on opinions like this until everyone in America was sufficiently, medievally stupid.