Look at all those magazines! Or are they clips? The Supreme Court has declined to hear challenges to state bans on assault-style rifles in Connecticut and New York, leaving in place lower court rulings that the laws don't violate the Holy Second Amendment. Get ready for a barrage of tweets and Facebook posts screaming "What part of 'shall not be infringed' doesn't the Supreme Court understand?"
If you make a car with no seatbelt, no brakes, that has no catylitic converter or muffler, no windshield or wipers, no blinkers, and has concrete tires, the government regulations will stop you from selling said car. And yet we are not in an Orwellian Dystopia. Or are we?
Nobody jumps off the Bay Bridge because the Golden Gate Bridge is so much cooler. Just like everybody uses an AR-15 assault style weapon, because who wants to look like a dick when you're shooting First Graders in the head?
CLEARLY he was not a responsible gun owner, as he was standing on the other side of a wall separating him from where other gun owners were shooting. If he'd been responsible, he wouldn't have been standing in the path of that bullet! HARRUMPH!!!
Every time I hear that bullshit about the 2nd being there so "you can rise up against tyranny", I want to slap somebody. I've heard relatively smart people repeating that nonsense, even.
We stopped gun manufacturers from selling fully automatic weapons "machine guns" when that became a problem, we can do the same with assault guns now that it's a problem.
If they are on the straight and narrow they should be packin'.
It's just the "others" that should be unarmed.
If you make a car with no seatbelt, no brakes, that has no catylitic converter or muffler, no windshield or wipers, no blinkers, and has concrete tires, the government regulations will stop you from selling said car. And yet we are not in an Orwellian Dystopia. Or are we?
Nobody jumps off the Bay Bridge because the Golden Gate Bridge is so much cooler. Just like everybody uses an AR-15 assault style weapon, because who wants to look like a dick when you're shooting First Graders in the head?
Word. It's not like some online game where the good guys have a color-coded nameplate conveniently hovering over their heads.
I'd say we should beat the things into plows if those guns weren't like 50% plastic.
“What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ doesn’t the Supreme Court understand?”
Funny, freedom of RELIGION is also covered by that phrase. Odd, that.
CLEARLY he was not a responsible gun owner, as he was standing on the other side of a wall separating him from where other gun owners were shooting. If he'd been responsible, he wouldn't have been standing in the path of that bullet! HARRUMPH!!!
I don't think I'll ever stop worrying about him. It's not like the knuckle-dragging shitheads are going to forget about him, you know.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Every time I hear that bullshit about the 2nd being there so "you can rise up against tyranny", I want to slap somebody. I've heard relatively smart people repeating that nonsense, even.
That originalism stuff is just crap as well, translating to "it means what I say it means".
Here's a safety enhancing feature for you: DON'T MAKE THE FUCKING THINGS.
Senate voted down the gun safety measures the Democrats proposed. Anyone surprised?
We stopped gun manufacturers from selling fully automatic weapons "machine guns" when that became a problem, we can do the same with assault guns now that it's a problem.
No. But now it's campaign ad material.