10 Comments
User's avatar
schmannity's avatar

Why get bogged down with words when you know it in your heart? Besides the Second Amendment, the rest is all legal mumbo jumbo except the part about impeaching Democrat presidents.

Expand full comment
JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

Aw shucks, we ain't so fancy up here in New England. We still honor the Constitution the old fashioned way: By reading it.

Expand full comment
π”…π”’π”’π”©π”·π”’π”Ÿπ”²π”Ÿπ”Ÿπ”ž's avatar

Don't matter if the guy's innocent ... he was convicted, which in Texas means that morality and conscience are suspeneded, therefore it's OK to kill him, if only for sport. This is the logic that Bush used, and Perry is right there with him.

Expand full comment
Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

Shittin' fraud, meet schaden freude.

Expand full comment
The Quirk's avatar

No Man-Licker Carcano jokes, Wonketeers?

You disappoint me.

Expand full comment
fuflans's avatar

he should pray for death.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Yeah, you fancy liberal Blue States. How many executioner jobs have your governors created? Thought so.

Expand full comment
JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

<i>"...a psychologist’s testimony that black people were more likely to commit violence."</i>

I can't fathom how that fits in to the "thoughtful process". It seems more like a <i>thoughtless</i> process -- black = violent = guilty = hang him.

But suppose we applied the "more likely" principle elsewhere. Imagine a Texan on trial here in Connecticut with the prosecution arguing "Texans are more likely to commit violence". If the Stetson fits, you must convict.

Expand full comment
fuflans's avatar

this would never have happened if he'd seceded.

Expand full comment
schmannity's avatar

Damn Supreme Court chock full of liberals like Scalia, Thomas, Roberts. . .

Expand full comment