Yes, we are still talking about this. We've been following the case of Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school senior in Virginia, and his quest to find a fucking bathroom to use at school. Grimm sued the Gloucester County School Board for the right to use the potty what matches his gender identity, and the district court ruled against him. But then the 4th Circuit Court Of Appeals
This is so bizarre--he is a boy now--why t5he fuck do they want him in the girls' room? Right wingers are getting stupider every day! I'm waiting to hear that aliens stole the brains of Repugs, or at least enough gray matter that they became Repugs. They make no sense and the election is a straight-out I.Q. test this year. SMH
Breyer didn't vote to leave a stay in place, but rather voted to grant a stay. I'm not understanding how that preserves the status quo, which is the 4th circuit's decision that Gavin can pee. Me stupid.
EXACTLY! It does not make sense. Just like Repugs spending more $$, hiring more federal employees than Dems...and all the rest of what they say. Ya think they might be lying?
It is much more insidious than that. It is more, if the nail does not fall in line, shove it out as the evil other for all the other nails to destroy lest someone get the bad idea to grow their own brain.
No. The 4th Circuit's decision was that the District Court erred by applying the wrong evidentiary standard when reviewing the evidence proffered by the appellant in support of the request for a preliminary injunction and that the District Court erred in dismissing the Title IX claim because the Government's interpretation of it's own regulations are to be accorded deference consistent with Auer. The question to be put before the Court is not where GG gets to pee, but what standards of review Courts are going to use in determining future cases under Title IX and granting injunctive relief.
The only thing that makes me remotely inclined to accept Breyer's defense is that hey, if in response to him allowing the conservatives to kick Grimm in the genital area, somewhere down the line he actually does get that "courtesy fifth" that literally saves someone's life, that's maybe actually a bigger deal?
Priorities, people.
In the bathroom? In the locker room with the pizza boy, maybe....
Another good reason to be in the library rather than out!!
(I hate losing good frames)
One hundred forty-one (141): days that the Senate Replicants have refused to hold hearings on President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland.
This is so bizarre--he is a boy now--why t5he fuck do they want him in the girls' room? Right wingers are getting stupider every day! I'm waiting to hear that aliens stole the brains of Repugs, or at least enough gray matter that they became Repugs. They make no sense and the election is a straight-out I.Q. test this year. SMH
Not holding my breath. Or my bladder.
Breyer didn't vote to leave a stay in place, but rather voted to grant a stay. I'm not understanding how that preserves the status quo, which is the 4th circuit's decision that Gavin can pee. Me stupid.
EXACTLY! It does not make sense. Just like Repugs spending more $$, hiring more federal employees than Dems...and all the rest of what they say. Ya think they might be lying?
So glad to hear it! I usually hang out in Wonkville. (Sorry for the weird shoutyness-- it was kinda irritating me for awhile).
I feel safer already.
Because they're cruel, ignorant assholes who want to punish him.
Rethug's philosophy is simple. If the nail doesn't fall into line, fucking pound it into submission.
It is much more insidious than that. It is more, if the nail does not fall in line, shove it out as the evil other for all the other nails to destroy lest someone get the bad idea to grow their own brain.
Depends... Old fella's prostate may be the size of a grapefruit, he might be able to hold it!
We will see if he can keep his Poise.
No. The 4th Circuit's decision was that the District Court erred by applying the wrong evidentiary standard when reviewing the evidence proffered by the appellant in support of the request for a preliminary injunction and that the District Court erred in dismissing the Title IX claim because the Government's interpretation of it's own regulations are to be accorded deference consistent with Auer. The question to be put before the Court is not where GG gets to pee, but what standards of review Courts are going to use in determining future cases under Title IX and granting injunctive relief.
The only thing that makes me remotely inclined to accept Breyer's defense is that hey, if in response to him allowing the conservatives to kick Grimm in the genital area, somewhere down the line he actually does get that "courtesy fifth" that literally saves someone's life, that's maybe actually a bigger deal?