The New Republic ran a profile of Rand Paul Monday with the headline “ President Rand Paul .” But why? Does anyone at the usually pretty sober and realistic (except for when they were really excited for the Iraq War) New Republic actually believe Rand Paul is a real contender?
While having lawmakers read bills before voting on them is obviously a good idea, any measures to enforce the act would fall foul of Paul's libertarian principles.
to be fair, the unpasteurized milk debate is a sour one.
Now it makes sense.
I don't know. Where is it on the spectrum with traffic stop slavery?
While having lawmakers read bills before voting on them is obviously a good idea, any measures to enforce the act would fall foul of Paul's libertarian principles.
That really long list of Departments that he doesn't like? That is what Pres. Paul will have on his drone "Kill List".
Rand Paul is just not creditable until he launches the blimp and no, that is not some sort of sexual innuendo. At least I think it isn't.