29 Comments
User's avatar
bobbert's avatar

Dude, he was charging $550 for HALF of a single wide. What do you think the cooking or toilet facilities were like? Livable?

bobbert's avatar

That's one of his other income properties.

bobbert's avatar

You know, I usually agree with the idea that regulatory bodies just want the problem to be <i>fixed</i>, and prefer to avoid punitive action. But in some cases, like this one, I feel that it's obvious that the offender <i>knew</i> he was violating the law. It pisses me off when that's not punished.

bobbert's avatar

Actually, that sounds like Tokyo.

bobbert's avatar

It's military bases, for sure. And cities over maybe 500,000.

bobbert's avatar

I'm pretty sure shypixel can deflect linkbait, if he wants to.

bobbert's avatar

It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.

bobbert's avatar

They tried that. And it was perfect.

Fitzgerald Chesterfield's avatar

Or <a href="http:\/\/www.babycenter.com\/stages-of-labor" target="_blank">a midwife</a>

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

$550? That's your August ConEd bill, if you've got two A/C units running.

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

I did that, once. Kid had watched 12 continuous hours of <i>Dr. Who.</i>

𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

Ran a pipe to the office sewer line - and paid nothing for sewer service. But he won't be fined, because IOKIYAAR.

OTOH, that big wad of benjamins suggests that the IRS ought to have a look at his books. A $66,000 "cash business" is much more suspicious than even a teabagger 501(c)(4).