It is so much fun to watch the Party of Personal Responsibility point fingers and self-implode, isn't it? It certainly is! Today's finger-pointing blame-game session comes courtesy the Tea Party, which has engaged in about a week of sober reflection and concluded that the GOP lost because Mitt was too moderate. No, really:
<i>For undermining &ldquo;true conservative&rdquo; candidates. And for &ldquo;choosing to ignore&rdquo; the conservative agenda.</i>
what lesson do you think they&#039;ve learned? (no snark, just curious).
Nom nom nomelet.
Drive faster! Take the curves wider!
now there are pipes spilled.
wtf?
Teabagger hindsight must be retarded.
Oh, I say. Well done!
Hell, even Nancy didn&#039;t dig his positions.
Isn&#039;t this just &quot;Chicago&quot;?
Sadly, I suspect the lesson learned is that they should collect TWICE as much money and run ads with more lies and better production values.
<i>For undermining &ldquo;true conservative&rdquo; candidates. And for &ldquo;choosing to ignore&rdquo; the conservative agenda.</i>
Get face tatoos or GTFO!!!
Bring on the beautiful, cleansing purgy purges!!!!!1!
<i>.if she chose to put any actual work into running</i>
Oh, crap. There&#039;s always a catch.
this is completely OT but can someone in chicago please explain why in the last two weeks we&#039;ve had traffic screw ups on the kennedy for:
a flour spill a maple syrup spill a traveling meth lab
is this how end times looks?
<i>Weren&rsquo;t there such things as Republican primary elections?</i>
It&#039;s always Obama&#039;s fault. (somehow)
The omelet &quot;ends&quot; justify the broken-egg &quot;means&quot;.
<i>&quot;...conservatives had wanted a candidate like President Reagan.&quot;</i>
And who would that be? Certainly not any of those animatronic Reagan-bots we saw in the primaries.
As many have noted, Reagan couldn&#039;t have been nominated in today&#039;s GOP environment.
Far more jobs were created during Clinton administration than under Reagan.