24 Comments
User's avatar
fuflans's avatar

what lesson do you think they've learned? (no snark, just curious).

Chris Grrr's avatar

Drive faster! Take the curves wider!

fuflans's avatar

now there are pipes spilled.

wtf?

Monsieur_Grumpe's avatar

Teabagger hindsight must be retarded.

Dashboard Buddha's avatar

Hell, even Nancy didn't dig his positions.

bobbert's avatar

Isn't this just "Chicago"?

bobbert's avatar

Sadly, I suspect the lesson learned is that they should collect TWICE as much money and run ads with more lies and better production values.

Joshua Norton's avatar

<i>For undermining “true conservative” candidates. And for “choosing to ignore” the conservative agenda.</i>

Get face tatoos or GTFO!!!

Chris Grrr's avatar

Bring on the beautiful, cleansing purgy purges!!!!!1!

Chris Grrr's avatar

<i>.if she chose to put any actual work into running</i>

Oh, crap. There's always a catch.

fuflans's avatar

this is completely OT but can someone in chicago please explain why in the last two weeks we've had traffic screw ups on the kennedy for:

a flour spill a maple syrup spill a traveling meth lab

is this how end times looks?

Chris Grrr's avatar

<i>Weren’t there such things as Republican primary elections?</i>

It's always Obama's fault. (somehow)

Chris Grrr's avatar

The omelet "ends" justify the broken-egg "means".

JustPixelz: IV%'er's avatar

<i>"...conservatives had wanted a candidate like President Reagan."</i>

And who would that be? Certainly not any of those animatronic Reagan-bots we saw in the primaries.

As many have noted, Reagan couldn't have been nominated in today's GOP environment.

Far more jobs were created during Clinton administration than under Reagan.