Here is a clever idea the Teabaggers have come up with to make sure President Obama stops getting his way: "Let's just get rid of him," they have decided . Yes, apparently, if America elects a president and then decides three years in that he is doing a poor job, not quite living up to his promises, or just flat out being an illegal Kenyan terrorist, America can just throw a tantrum and replace that bad president with a
I'm pretty sure they're going with the Machiavellian approach. Which, for the better or worse question leaves us with: six of one, half a dozen if the other.
In teatard, &quot;impeachment&quot; translates as &quot;replace the president with the governor of Texas&quot; doesn&#039;t it? Rock out to your new preznits anthem <a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=iz_SChZA9bM" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz_SChZA9bM">http://www.youtube.com/watc...
You noticed that extra-Constitutional use of impeachment too. For a group of people who claim to love the &quot;plain language of the Constitution&quot;, they sure like to piss on it when Obama is standing behind it.
They don&#039;t call it &quot;The One Star State&quot; for nuthin&#039;.
If Texas was a movie, it would be &quot;Troll 2&quot; If Texas was a car, it would be a Rascal. If Texas was a restaurant, it would be Hooters.
Was Nixon obviously a sociopath at the time? (I&#039;m not THAT old, so no recollection.) If people were all &quot;Jeez, I hope nothing happens to Ike&quot;, then yeah, we can move the date back... probably lots of examples from the 1800s, actually.
I&#039;m pretty sure they&#039;re going with the Machiavellian approach. Which, for the better or worse question leaves us with: six of one, half a dozen if the other.
In teatard, &quot;impeachment&quot; translates as &quot;replace the president with the governor of Texas&quot; doesn&#039;t it? Rock out to your new preznits anthem <a href="http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=iz_SChZA9bM" target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz_SChZA9bM">http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Maybe an impeachment would FINALLY convince him these people can&#039;t be reasoned with? Maybe he&#039;d start throwing some elbows?
Eisenhower had Nixon.
You noticed that extra-Constitutional use of impeachment too. For a group of people who claim to love the &quot;plain language of the Constitution&quot;, they sure like to piss on it when Obama is standing behind it.
I blame their textbooks.
In that scenario, Obama would be &quot;tried&quot; as a runaway.
He wishes! (Actually probably not. But just in case: Michelle, I am here for you.)
<i>...he characterized them as &quot;younger people who don&#039;t care about social security&quot;</i>
He&#039;s 80. Everyone is younger.
I guess he loves socialism enough to want to keep Social Security.
They don&#039;t call it &quot;The One Star State&quot; for nuthin&#039;.
If Texas was a movie, it would be &quot;Troll 2&quot; If Texas was a car, it would be a Rascal. If Texas was a restaurant, it would be Hooters.
A prick doctor who wants to treat only his fellow pricks.
Different approach, as it were, but same result.
Was Nixon obviously a sociopath at the time? (I&#039;m not THAT old, so no recollection.) If people were all &quot;Jeez, I hope nothing happens to Ike&quot;, then yeah, we can move the date back... probably lots of examples from the 1800s, actually.
Not the fucking laptop full of votes again.
&ldquo;We need to tie things up.&rdquo;
No, dickhead, you need to do your fucking job.
Never mind &#039;88 ... they started with Agnew.
&quot;Don&#039;t wake me when you&#039;re done, Marcus, or I&#039;ll kill you.&quot;