200 Comments
User's avatar
JAWs's avatar

“When you add up the 116 (who refused to go through drug screening) to the 65 people (who failed a drug test), that’s 175 or 180 people no longer receiving taxpayer-funded support for illegal activities,” the Republican lawmaker said.

175 or 180 people? Wow who'd a thought arithmetic would be such a moral relativist?

I'm just saying I'd probably run his statements through the 'ol fact checker doo-hickey before accepting such declaration at face value

Professor Fate's avatar

Maths is hard.And just what has this project COST the taxpayer?

Bub the misanthropic zombie's avatar

Math frightens religious fanatic state legislators. All science does. They can't risk people starting to think for themselves and properly evaluating the bullshit they do. That's why they just shout "cause Jesus said so" with their fingers stuffed in their ears all the fucking time.

JH Marx, Resister's avatar

1st time at a state run marijuana dispensary, I exclaimed to my friends, "I just bought Marijuana - and got a receipt!!"

JH Marx, Resister's avatar

Also, too, works well for civilians.

Paperless Tiger's avatar

They may have tasted many fine wines as well. Better get on that.

Partyofhealthcare?'s avatar

They get more per day than the drug guzzling poors get per month.That's good christian values for ya!

Doug Langley's avatar

Oh, $175 million. Or $180 million. Take your pick.

eddi_TBH's avatar

If it was an African nation, they would just loot the treasury and head for Monaco.

ellison's avatar

We liberal college kids do stop *muttering* about what bigoted cockweasels they are once we become Olds.

My Name Is Mok's avatar

Also, corrupt bastards.

Mavenmaven's avatar

116, why, Bush pere only needed one scary black person to win the national election.

Jonny On Maui's avatar

I'd like an order of catbutt pancakes please...