Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Crip Dyke's avatar

As you say, Robyn, it's not about "permissible". It's about "mandatory".

And guess what? In these movies, ***the women have agency and they make a choice***. (I assume. I mean, I'm a big ol' pervert but there are limits even for me, and this shit is not my kink.)

Liberals have since 1950 not once not ever forbid two people from boning or, indeed, marrying and painting the folk-art chairs they made out of the remains of Xmas trees for sale next December in their cute holiday store with the electric train buzzing round. And before that we didn't forbid anyone from doing that shit on the basis of heterosexuality. (We had eugenic leftists that thought that we could stop certain people from breeding and that would end poverty, and we were wrong about that, but that was a long time ago and the right wasn't exactly innocent of the eugenics thing either.)

You are permitted. It is permissed. It is just not mandatory, nor are you treated as if you're superior to every other woman on the planet who didn't settle down on a Christmas tree farm. We are not licking your toe sweat in the desperate hope of ingesting some Christmas magic that will make us 1950s housewives on a tree farm, but no one is making heterosexual marriage into overwhelmingly red and green households illegal. We're not even saying it's legal but you can't get on each other's health insurance and get less than the full standard tax benefits. YOU GET THE SAME. That's it! That's the only change: instead of being worshipped for being better, or indeed instead of having your choices imposed by law on others, YOU GET THE SAME.

In the grand game of "Is this fair or not?" you win "FAIR".

Can we be done with your whinging now?

Expand full comment
Martini Glambassador's avatar

I watch Marvel movies because I secretly want to fly and smite my enemies with my laser vision.

Expand full comment
702 more comments...

No posts