Roe v. Wade, guys. Roe v. Wade. I know you’re probably shaking your head sadly at the mere mention of that travesty, because even if you support a woman’s right to choose when she gets to grow a baby inside her belly, you probably consider it the worst decision ever decided by the Supreme Court. It makes Dred Scott look like Brown vs. the Board of Education, amirite?
Everybody hates Roe v Wade, says everybody the NYT saw fit to include in their piece.
Hey, lamestream media, how about you check <a href="http:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2013\/01\/roe-v-wade-poll-shows-record-support-86548.html" target="_blank">the evidence</a> instead of cherrypicking quotes that will appear to support your predetermined conclusion?
In particular, it&#039;s not like <em>Griswold</em>&#039;s precedent on a right to privacy wasn&#039;t the pillar on which <em>Roe</em> was built.
IANAL, but I think the argument is that discovering the &quot;right to privacy&quot; was kind of an end-around, and that a firmer justification could be drawn directly from the equal-protection amendment.
Everybody hates Roe v Wade, says everybody the NYT saw fit to include in their piece.
Hey, lamestream media, how about you check <a href="http:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2013\/01\/roe-v-wade-poll-shows-record-support-86548.html" target="_blank">the evidence</a> instead of cherrypicking quotes that will appear to support your predetermined conclusion?
In particular, it&#039;s not like <em>Griswold</em>&#039;s precedent on a right to privacy wasn&#039;t the pillar on which <em>Roe</em> was built.
Since gays don&#039;t generally get pregnant by accident, it seems that gay marriage should prevent abortions and therefore should be embraced.
It&#039;s that way on purpose. Filters out a large fraction of the dummies.
Oh, sure. Overturn Roe v Wade but allow the Citizens United ruling to stand. If God watches over this nation He sure must take a lot of fucking naps.
IANAL, but I think the argument is that discovering the &quot;right to privacy&quot; was kind of an end-around, and that a firmer justification could be drawn directly from the equal-protection amendment.
Until recently SCOTUS was all men who hung out in their robes together. Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that.
It was a &quot;bolt from the blue&quot; because abortion was unknown before Roe v. Wade.
<i>&quot;If only the court had let state legislatures do their jobs...&quot;</i>
One such state was California. Governor Reagan signed the bill that legalized abortion several years before Roe v Wade.
&ldquo;bolt out of the blue&rdquo;?
Needs more &quot;shoving it down out throats&quot;!