There Is Such A Thing As A Free Lunch (Now In Massachusetts Schools!)
Hooray for universal school lunch!
Massachusetts has become the eighth state — after California, Maine, Colorado Connecticut, Vermont, Minnesota and New Mexico — to offer universal free school lunch to students in grades K-12. Hooray!
Families are expected to save $1,200 per kid, per year, which is a whole lot of money for a lot of people.
As much as some people might say, “Well, why not just have it be for the kids who can’t afford lunch and let the kids whose parents can afford it pay their own way” there are a lot of reasons why that doesn’t work so well. For one, the mere fact of people knowing who is and is not paying for their own lunch can be humiliating for kids. For another, there are kids whose parents can afford it, but who may just forget or even lose it. For another another, kids having money on them for lunch at school can unfortunately lead to the classic “give me your lunch money” bullying scenarios.
Anything that makes class distinctions less obvious in schools is worth whatever it costs.
Gov. Maura Healey acknowledged this, explaining that part of the reason for implementing the program is that “free lunch” won’t have a stigma if everyone has “free lunch.”
“An investment in childhood nutrition that’s also removing a source of stress from our schools and homes,” she said.
I will say it till I die — the best, most popular policies are always going to be things that take things off people’s minds so they don’t have to think about them or worry about them. Even well-off people are happy to scratch something off that list.
And hey! It also means that it ensures that kids are going to be getting something nutritious to eat at lunch (instead of, say, skipping lunch and spending their lunch money on coffee and cigarettes, which is what some people used to do), and will therefore be better able to concentrate in class afterwards.
The universal free school lunch program implemented across the country was hugely popular and 74 percent of Americans believed it should continue (including 63 percent of Republicans), so hopefully we will see this happening in more states.
In NoDak, the Leg axed school lunches while increasing the reimbursement for their own lunches.
Because Fuck You.
OT deetdeedledeetdeedledeet breaking news sound effect dot gif
I know erryone probly really grumpy about the appointing of a special prosecutor for the great big Hunter Biden scandale, so here's the antidote:
𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽’𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗝𝗮𝗻. 𝟲 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲
𝗗𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝟵𝟬-𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗼𝗻, 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗧𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗮 𝗦. 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗸𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗿𝘀.
"The federal judge overseeing former President Donald J. Trump’s prosecution on charges of seeking to overturn the 2020 election rejected his request on Friday to be able to speak broadly about evidence and witnesses — and warned Mr. Trump she would take necessary “measures” to keep him from intimidating witnesses or tainting potential jurors."
and also: "Judge Chutkan, in her first appearance as trial judge in the case, made it clear — within minutes of ascending the bench — that she intended to view Mr. Trump primarily as a defendant rather than a political figure, and suggested she sided with the government’s push for a speedy trial."
The whole article is a treat: (ETA with gift linky):
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/11/us/politics/trump-judge-protective-order.html?unlocked_article_code=SsDHwouOr6T07x5tdEWiLsp0YtgdOzyfl12ZNTACJVY9SRwwVP4QL7qW1t7iy9IdK5o7WU1Z7ehiN-B3mah-vMrlhLV3NbWLN8GxbUcFeg9WCrl7ah3qioBDM5sU2rholSAbOEgCAC5iJ33HPGzLkKWerPfERYSI4evs7060YopM_ZwO-nMRGnz-j4RdagSBYaAobRyoq6VmGBEI4pRWq--KPh6HyvLXMaFfu4ROZwlmboe4s9tJrpfyhwqVc9LCSetoV2AoG9jBPbMMInh7KHTp5uf1uFkdil19_DGfmEuUH0jJorcngfQhOj-IMsEnL9-dI01w-RydCLyG7euFMm2ZdZ02Ns7biJo&smid=url-share