We have a verdict in New York's first revenge porn case, and it's bad news for anyone who has ever been humiliated after sending erotic self-portraits to their "main ho," "side piece," or "significant other," and wants to see that person convicted of a crime, in New York:
Considering that I do not have a Twitter account, but can go to twitter.com and view peoples' tweets without logging in, calling it "a subscriber-based social networking service" is, at best, an incomplete definition.
Now I would like to request that all of you who received those, um, modeling pictures from me to send them right back to me this instant! I had no idea there might be a downside.
I dated a comedian for a short time. She had lots of small penis jokes. Don't date comedians. Just. Don't.
Someone needs to take naked pictures of the judge and release them to internet gods.
Considering that I do not have a Twitter account, but can go to twitter.com and view peoples' tweets without logging in, calling it "a subscriber-based social networking service" is, at best, an incomplete definition.
Yes:
"Occupant" "Mail Recipient" "Our Neighbors At" "Postal Patron"
etc....
Better point than mine.
Also, when the "subscribers" potentially number in the hundreds of millions, the model sorta fails.
Holy shit!
Now I would like to request that all of you who received those, um, modeling pictures from me to send them right back to me this instant! I had no idea there might be a downside.
Swann's [having his] Way.
There's no Zeus to squawking about it.