Centrist yuppies can barely handle themselves now, after seeing the Great Man himself, Chief Justice John Roberts, save Obamacare from judicial overreach in a statesmanlike move to protect his Court's honor. It is stunning how much credit a Republican can get for not doing something 100% insane, just once, over the course of a lifetime. And blessed be the gods, Roberts ruling happened to coincide with a
Relax, Roscoe --the homeless guy at the Broadway subway station mutters in what might be Bulgarian, and I don't feel bad about not understanding him.
There might be something about "safe words" and the First Amendment in there, but it's a really long opinion and I haven't read it closely.
Why do I get the feeling Burke would be a denialist about AGW? &quot;Sorry about that, Maldives, but cutting emissions would have been just so, you know, <i>inconvenient.</i>
Both genders in one man(?)! As Steve Martin explained in <i>L.A. Story</i>: &quot;If I had breasts, I&#039;d never leave the shower.&quot; (paraphrase; too lazy to google the line)
I don&#039;t think we should be so eager to defend Roberts.
After all, he still gave us &quot;Citizens United&quot; and as soon as Prop. 8 gets to the SCOTUS, watch how fast he toes the wingnut political line once again.
Faux-intellectual experience for yuppie weenies, Jim. Thanks for giving me the cover I needed for not understanding much/any of these utterances by David Brooks.
1.(of a person) Excessively or ingratiatingly flattering; oily: &quot;anxious to please in an unctuous way&quot;. 2.(chiefly of minerals) Having a greasy or soapy feel.
Relax, Roscoe --the homeless guy at the Broadway subway station mutters in what might be Bulgarian, and I don&#039;t feel bad about not understanding him.
There might be something about &quot;safe words&quot; and the First Amendment in there, but it&#039;s a really long opinion and I haven&#039;t read it closely.
Hoping to get lucky. You know how it is with conservatives, hotels, and conferences away from home.
Plus &quot;intellectual&quot; and &quot;conservative&quot; co-existing in a single skull is a topic worthy of research, all by itself.
Nicely matched to his shirt, too.
Why do I get the feeling Burke would be a denialist about AGW? &quot;Sorry about that, Maldives, but cutting emissions would have been just so, you know, <i>inconvenient.</i>
And yet part of me says &quot;no&quot;.
Out west, where you vacation, the aspens will already be turning. They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them.
Both genders in one man(?)! As Steve Martin explained in <i>L.A. Story</i>: &quot;If I had breasts, I&#039;d never leave the shower.&quot; (paraphrase; too lazy to google the line)
who would have seen this coming?
I don&#039;t think we should be so eager to defend Roberts.
After all, he still gave us &quot;Citizens United&quot; and as soon as Prop. 8 gets to the SCOTUS, watch how fast he toes the wingnut political line once again.
/sorry for the lack of snark
Faux-intellectual experience for yuppie weenies, Jim. Thanks for giving me the cover I needed for not understanding much/any of these utterances by David Brooks.
Thank you. I thought he was referring to a person named Burk, another name I couldn&#039;t really place.
Word salad approaching an almost Palinesque level, except with multisyllabic words.
unc&middot;tu&middot;ous/ΓΒΓΒNG(k)CHoΓΒoΓΒs/
Adjective:
1.(of a person) Excessively or ingratiatingly flattering; oily: &quot;anxious to please in an unctuous way&quot;. 2.(chiefly of minerals) Having a greasy or soapy feel.
It works both ways!