10 Comments

Tom Friedman deserves ridicule (this is a statement of natural law, like "the speed of light in a vacuum is constant").

But, to ridicule this particular outbreak of Tom Friedman, I would have to read about it, which I will not do. I'm sure y'all took care of it.

Expand full comment

Add a few too many Gin and Tonics and Voila!

Expand full comment

Or fortune cookies.

Expand full comment

I'm just glad when my car starts.

Expand full comment

This country desperately needs some way of certifying or licensing pundits. Fred Barnes once claimed he could speak with authority on anything but he must be a Master Pundit. Does Friedman qualify as that or is he limited to Political/Economic Assistant Pundit? Of course there must be higher levels for people such as Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh.

Expand full comment

Exactly. Health insurance is only affordable or obtainable through employer group plans. Combine that with a high deductible plan and we have disincentives to become an entrepreneur or even change jobs. That good for employer -- no pesky ex-employees become or switching to competitors. But bad for the economy.

Expand full comment

yeah, it's hard to get interested in tv when you've never had cable and stopped watching regular programming in the mid-1990's. we just pick and choose the good stuff.

Expand full comment

instead of fucking start ups we should invest in our crumbling infrastructure (and Internet bandwidth which is shamefully bad compared to many other poorer countries).

which also means disinvesting from the fucking republican party.

Expand full comment

Mentioning Tom Friedman in my kitchen makes my vegetables and fruits go brown, cuz of the stupid!

Expand full comment

This is like when everyone started their own newspaper on the internet but called it a blog. Howz that workin' out for ya Tom?

Expand full comment