490 Comments
User's avatar
Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

That was so fucking shameful.

Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

For the fourth time in as many years.

Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

"Hung like a gnat", is what I hear.

Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

Thank you for that insight, it is good to hear from someone who knows.

Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

Those two words, should never conjugate.

Ethereal Fairy Natalie's avatar

That's why he pardoned those 4 mercs.

Oran Smiley's avatar

Ignore the worthless MOTHERFUCKING Bone Spurs POS once and for all.

B Johnson's avatar

The bases are named for LOSERS! I like bases named for WINNERS!!!

glenglish's avatar

Twenty-Twenty is the Year of the Rat. Trump is the Rat.

glenglish's avatar

Not just once, How about Forever on, A-Fucking-men?

glenglish's avatar

I know. But what the fuck was that Nashville shit all about?

Regret's avatar

I don't understand why it was part of any bill. Statues have owners that can make their own decisions, and bases have a maintenance budget they can use if they want to rename. These are not subjects the entire country needs to have a say in.

B Johnson's avatar

Not a lawyer. Just wondering aloud.

Don't understand the Section 230 thing. Doesn't free speech end at the property line, so to speak?

And aren't networks and servers private property?

If someone can be prosecuted for breaking into a private network and its servers, then it must be private property.

Therefore, one would assume, if the private property is owned by a business, the only right anyone has when using that network and servers is to not be discriminated against for race, gender, etc.

As a business, we reserve the right to refuse service for any reason. Why is this any different?

glenglish's avatar

England freed their slaves in 1772. About three-quarters of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were slave owners.