185 Comments
User's avatar
Shananigan's avatar

I wouldn't normally but I checked their posting history and they seem like a chronically judgmental know-it-all jackass so...

sarafina's avatar

I like how you say that.

sarafina's avatar

He's busy cleaning the cat litterbox.

sarafina's avatar

Susan was absolutely correct. HRC, as much as i wanted her to win, would have been years of gridlock. The Dotard is making things so shitty Wednesday may be a Brand New World!

sarafina's avatar

We'll know on Wednesday.

sarafina's avatar

Looks like him. Roger P. Mosely?

Dianna Deem's avatar

Gee, dunno why the name Susan Sarandon just popped into my head. /s

Petunia Cat's avatar

Bingo. There are dangerous people out there in ”the public“. I want the government to do stuff about that. The anti-Semite gun nuts with their photographs of all their guns on the Internet, that’s something the government should look at. And if they could add the fucking Dominionists who are traitors planning/hoping/wishing to take over the government, that would be good too.

Petunia Cat's avatar

Actually you and Bitter Scribe are both right. With politically motivated government mass surveillance it’s always about what they’re doing with the 'info', not the fact of gathering it. There’s a certain politically naïve idea that the GATHERING is the bad thing. Here it’s ignoring the actually mass violent far right fuckheads. This isn’t “too much“ policing, it’s just incompetent policing.

The rules of engagement for the military thing though, that is very concerning.

Dragon with the girl tattoo's avatar

Eater Austin`s guide to essential food trucks...

Typo or not?

Clark_Nova's avatar

There are also Socialist, Communist, and Anarchist forae on 4Chan and I can NOT believe they aren't monitoring those.