471 Comments

Dude...take out the thumb tacks holding the tin foil on your walls. I always use hot glue...makes for a more uniform Faraday cage.

Expand full comment

You claim he didn't recant. You provide the evidence. I'm entitled to question the evidence because there are questions as to its production and the primary source has a record in a court of law of serial fabrication.

Plus, where's the corroboration? A person, alone, making a statement is evidence. But without corroboration it's useless at trial.

Expand full comment

I thought you were leaving?

Expand full comment

I mean, we're simply returning your own grace by doing so yeah?

Expand full comment

By Pennsylvania law they couldn't count mail-in ballots until the day after Election Day.

You know who passed that law? The REPUBLICANS who control the Pennsylvania legislature. Take your issues up with them.

Expand full comment

Ha Ha Ha Ha HaHa Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha HaHa Ha Ha fucker

Expand full comment

Bolshevik! Bolshevik! Bolshevik!

Expand full comment

Aaaarrgh... I forgot. When you wrestle with a pig, you soon understand the pig is enjoying it more than you. Good night, sweet prig...good night. May your path be shallow and swift.

Expand full comment

Looks like the interrogators recanted for him, and he said Nope, didn't recant. That's technically recanting a recantation, but I'd call it correcting someone else's lie.

Expand full comment

He never recanted. They recanted on his behalf, and he publicly corrected their mistake.

Expand full comment

Imagine, however, if the situation were reversed: Biden had a huge lead going into the end of election night, and then suddenly Trump caught up from behind, in the middle of the night, after vote counting stops, observer ejections, and countless fraud allegations, and "won".I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but what the hell.You're right, if that happened we'd probably be pretty pissed. Good thing that didn't happen in this case. Vote counting didn't stop (despite the best efforts on Trump's behalf to stop it), the only observers ejected were the ones that weren't following the rules given to them, and plenty of Republican observers remained, and the "countless fraud allegations" are all so unbelievable as to be ludicrous. Also, everyone who was actually paying attention to voters' behaviors in the last 6 months knew that Trump would probably pick up a (possibly slim, possibly not) lead as the in-person votes were tabulated, and then that lead would almost certainly be substantially reduced or eliminated once mail-in ballots were counted. And that those ballots would be, as they are every election, the last ones to be tabulated.

Although I do find it interesting that you cling to the anti-Soviet rhetoric of the 50s while your Dear Leader cuddles up to Putin and tries to fill every wish on his list to weaken the West. How's the borscht today?

Expand full comment

Good thing you didn't read the part of the Independent article which says "6 days ago." And Bolsheviks, really?

We're up to our eyeballs in Christian Nationalists in the USA, thanks. One of the most prominent ones, Robert Jeffries, yesterday evening conceded that Joe Biden should be accepted as the winner of the election, and continuing to claim otherwise goes against the Bible's restrictions against lying, and therefore is a sin.

Now I could give a hoot less about the Bible, since I can avoid lying without being told by an ancient book and a wealthy grifter like Jeffries.

As for this unfounded claim of voter fraud, I find a couple points pretty hard to believe:

a) It only occurred in areas with lots of mail voting in substantially Democratic areas like Detroit and Philadelphia, and didn't occur anywhere in entire Republican-leaning states with mandatory mail voting, such as Utah and Nebraska.

b) That all this unsubstantiated fraud would be against Donald Trump, and not against the odious Mitch McConnell or Lindsey Graham.

Or, you just like writing huge walls of text with the word "Bolshevik" in it because you just learned the word but fail to grasp the meaning of it.

Expand full comment

dude, really? you come to a site you disagree with just to argue with the regulars? don't you have something better to do? or a place you can be on where you aren't constantly mocked and dismissed?

Expand full comment

sir, this is an arby's

Expand full comment

Sorcery. Didn’t you read the noncommenting rules? The necessary incantations are in the fine print.

Expand full comment

Close to none. All they care about is schmoozing at their fancy dinner parties and enjoying their 3 Martini lunches on the company credit card. What did I win?

Expand full comment