16 Comments
User's avatar
bobbert's avatar

Actually, it's even actual science -- there is some subsidence happening, which of course makes the flooding even worse.

bobbert's avatar

This exact argument (well, without acknowledging that the conspired-against (conspiritees?) are fucktards and imbeciles, appears in the comments thread of the linked article.

bobbert's avatar

My favorite (bar) part of the article is the headline, which tells (implicitly) us that "sea level rise" is a "buzzword". Always nice to have some thoughtful analysis from the Fourth Estate.

SullivanSt's avatar

Doesn't appear to be working )-;

SullivanSt's avatar

<blockquote>oh, fuck it, I can't go on.</blockquote>

I'm starting to wonder whether their plan is to flood our brains with so much fucking stupid we all just off ourselves to end the pain.

Gherkins d'Resistance's avatar

They don't mean you <i>can not</i> explain it. They mean YOU ARE FORBIDDEN FROM EXPLAINING IT.

SullivanSt's avatar

What are you talking about? Dude, it's the RED planet!

SullivanSt's avatar

Well, that's at least as effective as renaming rising sea levels, so yeah, that'll obviously work. Bravo!

SullivanSt's avatar

See, I'm not Debbie Downer <em>all</em> the time.

Spurning Beer's avatar

Andrew Breitbart was just stirring up discussion.

Sarah Palin was just letting someone else take a turn at being governor.

Frank Luntz is just polishing turds.

SullivanSt's avatar

So if sea level rise is not a thing, you'll be perfectly OK with us burying you up to your head about a foot inland from the high tide mark from, say, 1980, won't you, Del. Stolle?

Fartknocker's avatar

I'm not surprised by this. I glanced at today's Arizona Republic, which has an article about flouridation of water. The wingnut comments are absolutely priceless. General Ripper from Dr. Strangelove would be proud.

Spurning Beer's avatar

"Weather sneezes"