He looks so stank Donald Trump headed to the G7 summit in Canada today, and boy oh boy was he in rare form before he left. Trump is so sick of Canada and our European allies' bullshit, and by bullshit, he means he's got tariffs on his brain, and that OUR ALLIES are being mean to Vladimir Putin.
I am going to take another stab at this since we keep on being inundated by the talking dick heads stating that the president cannot be indicted and tried during his time in office. I think the dick heads are presenting an argument that is not simply mooted, but vitiated by Article I, Section 3, of the Constitution. According to the second to last paragraph of Section 3, "[t]he Senate shall have the sole Power to try all impeachments. The last paragraph of Section 3 goes on to state: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: But the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to the Law." Liability under the law is not predicated on conviction by the Senate, but on the strictures of the law which govern every citizen's conduct.I don't believe the founding fathers were speaking of trial only upon conviction. I believe they were stating unequivocally that impeachment was not the only avenue by which a president must account for his conduct. Whether convicted by the Senate or not, which is a political remedy, the president would still face trial in a court of law. If a president could only be tried in a court of law if conviction by the Senate were to occur, then in those instances in which no conviction were had because of political maneuverings, a president could never be tried in a court of law. The president, by Article I, Section 3, should face trial not only in the Senate but also in a court of law. The remedies co-exist and one is not contingent upon the other. Whoever is positing that a president can only be impeached during his time in office is misrepresenting the Constitution itself either willfully or foolishly. A president who commits crimes must be tried in a court of law, not simply the Senate. Otherwise, the dick heads make a mockery of our legal system.
That's rather surprising actually. I'm willing to bet Canada has had a US strategy for years, after the fact that the US has a strategy for literally everyone became a poorly kept secret.
Why do I get the feeling it's not a coincidence that he tried to pardon Mohammad Ali after it was drilled into his head that accepting his pardon meant he would be forever guilty?
By that logic both Germany and Japan should be able to just fuck over the US in any trade deals. What do you think two atom bombs wiping out whole cities should be worth?
Rereading, after deep breaths and sleep, I'm so glad to see that Shitgibbon has conquered the word "meeting." Using it so many times, in a single vomit, is quite impressive.
They made him walk (what, no golf cart?) about 150 feet to greet the Trudeau's and he was huffing and puffing pretty good by the time he had slowly lumbered the distance.
He is so obviously a traitor, right out in public. Holy. Hell. Can we just CTRL-ALT-DEL or hold down PWR for 10 seconds when he's gone, and do a full reboot?
Funny, I was just imagining some neutral country like Switzerland or Norway helping to negotiate a cease-fire or even a treaty between Republicans and Democrats.
I am going to take another stab at this since we keep on being inundated by the talking dick heads stating that the president cannot be indicted and tried during his time in office. I think the dick heads are presenting an argument that is not simply mooted, but vitiated by Article I, Section 3, of the Constitution. According to the second to last paragraph of Section 3, "[t]he Senate shall have the sole Power to try all impeachments. The last paragraph of Section 3 goes on to state: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: But the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to the Law." Liability under the law is not predicated on conviction by the Senate, but on the strictures of the law which govern every citizen's conduct.I don't believe the founding fathers were speaking of trial only upon conviction. I believe they were stating unequivocally that impeachment was not the only avenue by which a president must account for his conduct. Whether convicted by the Senate or not, which is a political remedy, the president would still face trial in a court of law. If a president could only be tried in a court of law if conviction by the Senate were to occur, then in those instances in which no conviction were had because of political maneuverings, a president could never be tried in a court of law. The president, by Article I, Section 3, should face trial not only in the Senate but also in a court of law. The remedies co-exist and one is not contingent upon the other. Whoever is positing that a president can only be impeached during his time in office is misrepresenting the Constitution itself either willfully or foolishly. A president who commits crimes must be tried in a court of law, not simply the Senate. Otherwise, the dick heads make a mockery of our legal system.
World's most elaborate combover.
Jared must be pissed he didn't get a chance to sell those plans first.
That's rather surprising actually. I'm willing to bet Canada has had a US strategy for years, after the fact that the US has a strategy for literally everyone became a poorly kept secret.
Why do I get the feeling it's not a coincidence that he tried to pardon Mohammad Ali after it was drilled into his head that accepting his pardon meant he would be forever guilty?
Running like hell, wouldn't you?
By that logic both Germany and Japan should be able to just fuck over the US in any trade deals. What do you think two atom bombs wiping out whole cities should be worth?
The new government in Italy is calling for dropping Russian sanctions. And oh yes the typical no-more-immigrants and standard xenophobia.
Wonder where they got that idea from.....
He might grab her pussy instead if she's rating high enough.
Rereading, after deep breaths and sleep, I'm so glad to see that Shitgibbon has conquered the word "meeting." Using it so many times, in a single vomit, is quite impressive.
Slightly? Or a lot?
I like your line, but I'm laying a Franklin on the over.
They made him walk (what, no golf cart?) about 150 feet to greet the Trudeau's and he was huffing and puffing pretty good by the time he had slowly lumbered the distance.
He's ready for a Don Vlad hook up whenever it happens. They've been chatting on Grindr with his secret Obamaphone. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
He is so obviously a traitor, right out in public. Holy. Hell. Can we just CTRL-ALT-DEL or hold down PWR for 10 seconds when he's gone, and do a full reboot?
This is beyond anything close to OK.
Funny, I was just imagining some neutral country like Switzerland or Norway helping to negotiate a cease-fire or even a treaty between Republicans and Democrats.