40 Comments

Yes dear Wonketeers, I should have clarified what kind of books creationist-engineeers might be quoting from. I'm sure when you quote from old books you are 1) capable of distinguishing between fiction and non- fiction and 2) you do not use works of fiction to explain the creation of the universe. Unless you're quoting from The Hitch-hikers Guide books in which case, please carry on.

Expand full comment

Please to below reply to Suspected Democrat. Also you don't quote from old books that originate from oral history to design & building things, not even theories, do you? If you do then engineering doesn't work the way I thought it did and I will look at bridges more closley in the future. Also my digital appliances. Sorry, too lazy to link to the piece about hacking kitchen appliances.

Expand full comment

Genesis I and Genesis II are as different as chalk and cheese, in both the Bible and the band.

Expand full comment

Oh, for crying out loud. I've spent this whole thread repeating somebody else's comments less cogently.

Expand full comment

Yup.

Yup.

Expand full comment

No, some of your really crucial atoms weren't created until the first stars exploded, well after the creation of the universe. Feel peppier.

Expand full comment

Actually, I like that. I also like CE = "Common Era", but I'm a pinko.

Expand full comment

So, without having watched it (because I pretty much know what each guy is gonna say), I will differ slightly from Dawkins. It is undoubtedly true that most fundies will NEVER be persuaded by the science guy, and that they will automatically trumpet that this "debate" was a big win for their side.

On the other hand, (1) if there is any such thing as a person undecided between dogma and science, that person is likely to have been nudged towards science; and (2) there is a chance that some intelligent fundies might get something to think about.

Changing minds is a slow process, requiring far more patience than I have. But, except for violent conflict, changing minds is the only way to go.

Expand full comment

Only everything you see in the MRI.

Expand full comment

The mod is one of the CNN "journalists."

Expand full comment

Ham: "If it's all over when you die, what's the point of discovery?" The knowledge lives on, you ineffable nitwit. Until we kill off our whole species, of course.

Expand full comment

Me too. I'm going to have to replay it later. :(

Expand full comment

Cuz Chris Hemsworth is hawt?

Expand full comment

Ganesha

Expand full comment

This is the fourth or fith time Ham has claimed "the laws of logic" are a Christian discovery. Say what? Probably thinks "Barbara Celarent Darii" means "Barbara hides the salami".

Expand full comment

Reading all these comments I am baffled by how either stupid or crafty is Ham person is. Logic:early man: fire= ow ergo do not stick hand in fire, put ham in fire instead. Historical record: written documents, like say the Constitution or anyone's autobiography ever. (with some room for fluffing for vanity's sake) Noah's ark: how did all the millions of insects, many recently discovered and fungi get collected and stored. I forget, how where plants saved? Did they just float to the top of the water or something? And no carnivore ate anything living while on this divine cruise ship? Does Christian righteous make lions prefer salad? Does being blessed by god make a bunch of animals constipated for 40 days ? Dumbest fucking myth ever to base an arguement on. Except maybe the Hindu one with the turtles and the sea of milk, but I've never seen that one trotted out as actually happening.

Expand full comment