https://www.justice.gov/epstein Is where you go to search what has been released. Lutnick is all over it, including an 11/20/2012 email to him that says:
Hello Mr. Lutnick. Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St. Thomas
some over the holidays. Jeffrey requested I please pass along some phone numbers
to you so the two of you can possibly get together. Any numbers you wanted to
pass along to Jeffrey would be great as well.
Jeffrey's care takers of his island are [redacted]They are CC'd
here.
[redacted]
Jeffrey's office on St. Thomas is FTC. Daphne and Anna are the contacts and are
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools. Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns." Former Rep. Margorie Taylor Greene.
"...and then father Staley USED HIS DAUGHTER to help his own personal connection with Epstein."
Fixed it for you (professional editor here). Still, I can't help wondering if my version is too soft. There is, after all, at least one word for this behavior. It starts with 'p' and it sure ain't "pretty."
You're not the only person I've heard point out how he just kept rambling on about "the children" and "the nannies" like -- dude, nobody needed to know any of that
I am a linguistic analyst and wrote an article dissecting Lutnick's story about his "one and absolutely done" meeting with Epstein -- showing that it was a total story. Among other things, Lutnick used the present tense (we use the past tense for past events, and the present tense for our imagination).
I was disappointed by the weak questions in the hearing. "Did you see anything on the island?" "We saw his staff." UMM RED FLAG! And no follow up question! His wife's blink rate was through. The. Roof. indicating major internal stress. Innocent people don't feel that; the truth is on their side.
And the final question: "Would you be willing to ensure that the file is complete to share... any records you have that relate to Jeffrey Epstein?"
Lutnick: “I will surely talk about that, I, I hadn’t thought about that, I, I have nothing to hide. Absolutely not.”
Will Lutnick share his records? No. How do we know? Because he said "absolutely not" and didn’t say he would. He said he will “talk about that.” People who are truthful phrase things in the positive. Dishonest people phrase things in the negative. “I have nothing to hide” and “absolutely not” are lies, lies and lies. Dude's family probably wiped their devices as soon as they got home.
What I don't understand is why Howard Lutnick made those comments about getting "grossed out" by Epstein in 2005. It seems those remarks were gratuitous and unnecessary. Surely he would have known that his statements would be later contradicted?
I still haven't gotten over nannies, *plural*, for his four kids. A person like that definitely knows the struggles of the working class.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00277024.pdf
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To:[redacted]
Subject: Re: Fw:
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:53:33 +0000
I tried to call
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, wrote:
Hey jeffery! Sorry didn't call you... Had a few more mid terms last wk and im finally
finished with them:) iif you want to call me tngt I'm free. Miss you!
- Sent from my Palm Pre
From:
Date: May 5, 2010 8:15 AM
Subject:
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Hi Jeffery,
thank you so much! I met with Eva yesterday. she said I was not
qualified enough for assistant but that iI can volunteer which I would
love to do.
Also I may baby sit/ hang out with her 9 year old daughter a few times
a Wk! : D
And this congratulatory email about keeping the pools down:
Kudos Mr. President Because if you can be blamed for the country's failures you should be
applauded when things go well.... Again.... Bravo Mr. President
******
Wealth gap between middle class and rich widest
ever
Growing wealth gap
$595K
$639K
P
is $97K
$97K
IIIII _
2010
2013
OOOOOO POW MIAMI wan
Not only are middle class suffering from stagnant incomes, their wealth hasn't grown at all either.
That's led to the widest wealth gap on record between the middle class and the rich. The median
household net worth of middle-income Americans remained at $96,500 between 2010 and 2013,
according to a new report from the Pew Research Center, which looked at Federal Reserve Bank data.
Upper-income households, however, saw their wealth grow to $639,400 last year, up from $595,300.
That means the rich have 6.6 times more wealth than the middle class, a figure that's grown from 4.1 in
1998 and 3.4 in 1983. It's also a record 69 times the wealth of lower-income Americans, who had
accumulated only $9,300 as of last year. Part of the reason for the gap stems from how the rich and
the middle class build wealth. The former are more likely to invest in the stock market, which has been
on a tear in recent years. The latter have more of their net worth tied up in the housing market, which
hasn't recovered as much.
That's also why the Great Recession had a bigger impact on the net worth of the middle class. Back in
2007, before the housing crash, the middle class saw its median wealth soar to $158,400. The rich also
haven't recovered fully from the downturn, but they are a lot closer to their 2007 peak of $718,000.
Looking longer term, the rich have more than doubled the size of their nest eggs over the past three
decades, while the middle class have inched up 2.3%. Pew defines middle income as family of four
with a household income between $44,000 and $132,000. Some 46% of American household fall into
middle income under its methodology, which adjusts for family size. Upper-income Americans are
those who earn more than $132,000 for a family of four. And that's widening the already massive
wealth gap between whites and other racial and ethnic groups to near record levels.
This is a fun one:
[redacted] "do you want me to try to do her.. or just torture her on
[redacted[ do you want me to try to do her.. or just torture her on fri); Sep 9[@); 2011 at
; wrote:M)
2:31 PMMI: Tancredi Marchiolo( Subject: Re: From: jeevacation@gmail.com
From a 2021 FBI report:
"Further investigation by activities with JP Morgan, Russian Hedge 1; executives in the financial business. linked Howard Lutnick to illegal
and other senior
has documented proof
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
3501.238-005
Page I of 3
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA 00095297
EFTA01249210
50D-NY-3027571 Serial 595
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
Title: U NT0C2020 288hmb01 Alleged Money Laundering by Howard Lutnick
via BGC Financial and Cantor Fitzgerald
Re: 272-NY-0, 04/23/2021
showing money laundering and Ponzi schemes by Lutnick via offshore shell
companies, liquid funding, and real estate brokerage firms. is
using a "global Ponzi share" scheme involving over 3,500 BGC employees
who are forced to contribute 10% of their earnings into the scheme.
Lutnick is deeply rooted to the royal family and has multiple high
profile and celebrity connections. Lutnick claims to be a philanthropist,
but is merely using his charities as a "smokescreen" for his illegal
activity. Many of the individual involved in Lutnick's charities have
criminal breaches against them.
believes he has supporting documents which could link Lutnick to
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell and Sarah Ferguson, a
royal family member, host events called La Dolce Vita Parties, where high
profile celebrities and executives contribute large donations to attend.
The donations are linked to causes involving children. Lutnick made "huge
donations" to these events. Epstein also sold Lutnick a house for $10
dollars through a trust fund, which was then sold for millions shortly
after prior to the money going overseas.
stated he has multiple regulatory reporting documents he can
provide to an agent to substantiate his claims. would like to
speak to an agent to better and more thoroughly outline and tie
everything together.
In addition, believes its suspicious Lutnick's contributed over
65 million dollars to Haverford College in New York, although he cannot
prove any illegal activity concerning this aspect.
Database Queries
Sentinel and Guardian queries for Howard Lutnick revealed 26 results in
the NY division case files including restricted closed case no.:272D-NY-
306108, Serial 204, concerning money laundering and control file case
no.:194-NY-C277070-B, Serial 392, concerning a RICO violations/real
estate scheme.
UNCLASSIF
Oh, and this:
"From: "Gilbert, Matthew" <I lt
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein
Date: December 19, 2012 4:47:26 PM EST
To: 'Lesley Groff
Hi,
You can call me any time-- Howard's cell is [redacted] Allison Lutnick is [redacted]
Matthew Gilbert
Office of Howard W. Lutnick
Chairman
Cantor Fitzgerald"
https://www.justice.gov/epstein Is where you go to search what has been released. Lutnick is all over it, including an 11/20/2012 email to him that says:
Hello Mr. Lutnick. Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St. Thomas
some over the holidays. Jeffrey requested I please pass along some phone numbers
to you so the two of you can possibly get together. Any numbers you wanted to
pass along to Jeffrey would be great as well.
Jeffrey's care takers of his island are [redacted]They are CC'd
here.
[redacted]
Jeffrey's office on St. Thomas is FTC. Daphne and Anna are the contacts and are
also CC'd here.
FTC Office
Thank you very much,
Lesley
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
[O]𝘯 9/11 𝘏𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘭𝘶𝘤𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘺.
“Luckily”, sure, you betcha.
I think he knew
AND I think he shorted his stock
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools. Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns." Former Rep. Margorie Taylor Greene.
"...and then father Staley USED HIS DAUGHTER to help his own personal connection with Epstein."
Fixed it for you (professional editor here). Still, I can't help wondering if my version is too soft. There is, after all, at least one word for this behavior. It starts with 'p' and it sure ain't "pretty."
Saw a bumpersticker that reads "Nut Lick Sez Whut?"
"We left with all of my children."
What an extremely curious thing to say.
Was there the possibility of leaving some of them behind?
Nothing to see here! Very innocent! How could my children be involved (of course they were: they're human shields against public criticism).
This right here ^^
You're not the only person I've heard point out how he just kept rambling on about "the children" and "the nannies" like -- dude, nobody needed to know any of that
I am a linguistic analyst and wrote an article dissecting Lutnick's story about his "one and absolutely done" meeting with Epstein -- showing that it was a total story. Among other things, Lutnick used the present tense (we use the past tense for past events, and the present tense for our imagination).
I was disappointed by the weak questions in the hearing. "Did you see anything on the island?" "We saw his staff." UMM RED FLAG! And no follow up question! His wife's blink rate was through. The. Roof. indicating major internal stress. Innocent people don't feel that; the truth is on their side.
And the final question: "Would you be willing to ensure that the file is complete to share... any records you have that relate to Jeffrey Epstein?"
Lutnick: “I will surely talk about that, I, I hadn’t thought about that, I, I have nothing to hide. Absolutely not.”
Will Lutnick share his records? No. How do we know? Because he said "absolutely not" and didn’t say he would. He said he will “talk about that.” People who are truthful phrase things in the positive. Dishonest people phrase things in the negative. “I have nothing to hide” and “absolutely not” are lies, lies and lies. Dude's family probably wiped their devices as soon as they got home.
My article, if you're interested in the analysis: https://theliteralsubtext.substack.com/p/lutnicks-lies
Why the entire press corps didn't walk out after Trump's trashing of Kaitlan Collins is beyond me. "Next question..."
Access 𝘶̈𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘴.
What I don't understand is why Howard Lutnick made those comments about getting "grossed out" by Epstein in 2005. It seems those remarks were gratuitous and unnecessary. Surely he would have known that his statements would be later contradicted?
Why say anything at all?
These people are all high on their own supply and think they are above consequences. So far, they are right.