The American Patriarchy Association, fronted by spokescreep Bryan Fischer, is calling for Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan to recuse themselves from the Supreme Court's upcoming case on same-sex marriage because they're entirely too biased on the issue.
...considering that Scalia and Thomas love to moonlight on the speaker circuit for every Neo Fascist conservative group in existences, this guy may want to rethink what categorizes as impartial!
<em>[Any] justice who has tipped his hand on how he would vote on same-sex &ldquo;marriage,&rdquo; any justice who has taken sides, any justice whose ability to be objective on the matter in question, has a legal, moral, ethical and professional duty to withdraw.</em>
And Scalia&#039;s dissent in <em>U.S. v. Windsor</em> doesn&#039;t &quot;tip his hand&quot; as to how he would rule?
Fischer also says <a href="http:\/\/www.rightwingwatch.org\/content\/fischer-jesus-would-support-use-torture" target="_blank">Jesus supports torture</a>. Who can forget the Gospel of Master X? <i>&quot;More nails,&quot; cried out the Lord. Lo, I did as he commanded.</i>
Nothing Gai there, just dead hookers.
If your beard grows more than a half-inch, you&#039;re officially Muslim.
And the Catholics on the court aren&#039;t biased.
Fischer proves that humans can have negative IQs.
Fischer should recuse himself from commenting on this subject, since he&#039;s so obviously biased.
I want in on the Big Gay IPO. I see great growth potential.
...considering that Scalia and Thomas love to moonlight on the speaker circuit for every Neo Fascist conservative group in existences, this guy may want to rethink what categorizes as impartial!
What did the RWNJ&#039;s have to say about this incident? <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/18/scalia.recusal/">http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW...
Clearly, only a court comprised entirely of asexual judges can come to an unbiased decision.
<i>&quot;In fact, <b>he</b> would be violating federal law if he didn&rsquo;t&quot;</i>
Obviously does not apply to girl justices.
...Scalia is clearly a <strong>GOAT FUCKER</strong> so I will expect that he will recuse himself from any goat related cases?!
Are you also giving away ... <i>(looks around room)</i> ... 40W lightbulbs, one man&#039;s black left glove (long story), dishes?
Scalia reproduced!? First, eeewww. Second, shows heterosexual bias. Third, eeeewwww.
Prove that does <i>not</i> happen!
<em>[Any] justice who has tipped his hand on how he would vote on same-sex &ldquo;marriage,&rdquo; any justice who has taken sides, any justice whose ability to be objective on the matter in question, has a legal, moral, ethical and professional duty to withdraw.</em>
And Scalia&#039;s dissent in <em>U.S. v. Windsor</em> doesn&#039;t &quot;tip his hand&quot; as to how he would rule?
Oh wait, he agrees with you. So no problem there.
Fischer also says <a href="http:\/\/www.rightwingwatch.org\/content\/fischer-jesus-would-support-use-torture" target="_blank">Jesus supports torture</a>. Who can forget the Gospel of Master X? <i>&quot;More nails,&quot; cried out the Lord. Lo, I did as he commanded.</i>
I have long been in favor of castrating about half of them.