You know, we really can't figure out anymore if right-wingers are playing some four-dimensional meta chess sorta thing these days or have really become untethered from reality or why even choose. Exhibit eleventy: the weird tendency of wingnuts to cry foul when people have the temerity to quote them. Witness Bradlee Dean, who
I'm tough, so I looked. It's .. interesting. Apparently there is a wine-vs.-grape juice struggle going on between their "translators." And the wine guy says that the miracle at Cana shows foreknowledge of quantum mechanics.
Otherwise, it's as you'd expect - all that stuff about giving alms to the poor is voluntary, and when Jesus criticized rich people, he was really only talking about "idle misers."
Typical lamestream media screwup. It is wrong, <i>wrong, </i>WRONG to characterize E W Jackson as a &quot;terrible pile of stupid.&quot; He is actually a steaming heap of stupid.
Missed his chance to be on the Daily Show by a day. (I would link to last nights&#039; piece on Christian persecution, but I&#039;d have to figure out how.)
One of the classics, that one. If we ever did allow literacy tests for voting, I think it should be a reading comprehension test based on that email chain.
Why don&rsquo;t they just get God and Jesus to run for office? Great name recognition and both of them are in the Republican&rsquo;s back pocket.
I&#039;m tough, so I looked. It&#039;s .. interesting. Apparently there is a wine-vs.-grape juice struggle going on between their &quot;translators.&quot; And the wine guy says that the miracle at Cana shows foreknowledge of quantum mechanics.
Otherwise, it&#039;s as you&#039;d expect - all that stuff about giving alms to the poor is voluntary, and when Jesus criticized rich people, he was really only talking about &quot;idle misers.&quot;
i was just yesterday thinking about &#039;rent is too damn high&#039; and waiting for a suitable place to post. you win!
cheers!
Well, there&#039;s his problem, then.
It would be if Wonkette allowed comments, but since this is not the case, no.
So he was really talking about a fine pint? Okay then, I believe I&#039;ll have one.
Typical lamestream media screwup. It is wrong, <i>wrong, </i>WRONG to characterize E W Jackson as a &quot;terrible pile of stupid.&quot; He is actually a steaming heap of stupid.
If Wonkette allowed commenting, I imagine the comments would offset the sadness with snarky joy.
Some of my finest fapping occurred in the safe harbor of my mother&#039;s womb. No distractions, no text messages, etc.
Missed his chance to be on the Daily Show by a day. (I would link to last nights&#039; piece on Christian persecution, but I&#039;d have to figure out how.)
Sounds like <em>somebody</em> wants to live in the Conservapedia universe.
How are they doing on their Bible re-write, anyhow? I refuse to go look.
&quot;Listen to me!1!!!!&quot; &quot;Don&#039;t listen to me !11!!!1!&quot;
Make up your mind.
One of the classics, that one. If we ever did allow literacy tests for voting, I think it should be a reading comprehension test based on that email chain.
I&#039;m stumped.
Oh, you meant people who profess Christianity, not people who actually live by it&#039;s tenets...
<i>&quot;...anybody that expresses a Biblical worldview is ... persecuted for doing so.&quot;</i>
He <i>so</i> wanted to say &quot;crucified&quot;.
Why don&rsquo;t they just get God and Jesus to run for office? Great name recognition and both of them are in the Republican&rsquo;s back pocket.
<i>the weird tendency of wingnuts to cry foul when people have the temerity to quote them.</i>
This is a private post. Please do not read.