Sorry, liberals, you probably thought that Barack Obama won the debate on Tuesday or whatever, BUT: just as sometimes you can retroactively have your Olympic medals taken away for cheating with drugs, or have winning football games turn into losses
I'm not sure it'd be so much "Michelle is not impressed" so much as "Michelle is disappointed in you", which is much more withering.
HEY! This is a made up issue by the wing nuts! (But what isn't?) Here's the actual rule:
<blockquote>The rule: Article 9, Section A, Subsection 7: &quot;All members of the debate audience <strong>will be instructed by the moderator</strong> before the debate goes on the air and by the moderator after the debate goes on the air not to applaud, speak, or otherwise participate in the debate by any means other than by silent observation, except as provided by the agreed upon rules of the October 16 town hall debate.&quot;</blockquote> The rule is only that the audience be so instructed. I heard Candy Crowley do that (check the transcript).
i was just listening to the debate on the radio but knew within three words that he was a bagging tool. something about that shaggy frat boy way of speaking.
<i>&quot;it would have been only fair if Tagg Romney had been allowed to punch Obama in the face.&quot;</i>
I&#039;ll grant that Mister T ultimately restrained himself. But consider his impulse to violence. And also consider that his father -- the Mitt -- complained about his sons&#039; constant lying* at the last debate. I can only conclude T and the boys were raised by some single-mother-crack-whore-welfare-queen. Or a gay couple. ________________________________________ * ROMNEY: <i>&ldquo;Look, I&rsquo;ve got five boys I&rsquo;m used to people saying something that&rsquo;s not always true but just keep repeating it and ultimately hoping I&rsquo;ll believe it.&quot;</i> The apples don&#039;t fall far from the tree.
Not for nuthin, but the debate rules Romney agreed to said the candidates couldn&#039;t question each other. I&#039;m just going to assume there is also outrage in wing-world about R-bot&#039;s flagrant flaunting of that rule.
(He wanted to be like Dirty Harry: &quot;I know what you&#039;re thinking. Did you issue five drilling permits or six? To be honest, I lost count. So, do you fell lucky punk?&quot; But it came off as rude or demented.
I&#039;m not sure it&#039;d be so much &quot;Michelle is not impressed&quot; so much as &quot;Michelle is disappointed in you&quot;, which is much more withering.
But only after someone else had shot them and peed on them.
&quot;Let&#039;s Hilify this biznatch&quot;
yeah, doesn&#039;t come across as intended.
Nanotechnology needs to improve a little bit first, but then, THEY&#039;VE GOT THIS!
It&#039;s not nail polish, it&#039;s her blue blood showing through.
&quot;Candidate Wives&quot; is also the title on a binder on Mitt&#039;s granddad&#039;s shelf.
Oh man, are there any people in the medical field out there in Wonkville? Someone with some knowledge can probably answer this.
Did they receive second or third-degree butthurt injuries that night?
HEY! This is a made up issue by the wing nuts! (But what isn&#039;t?) Here&#039;s the actual rule:
<blockquote>The rule: Article 9, Section A, Subsection 7: &quot;All members of the debate audience <strong>will be instructed by the moderator</strong> before the debate goes on the air and by the moderator after the debate goes on the air not to applaud, speak, or otherwise participate in the debate by any means other than by silent observation, except as provided by the agreed upon rules of the October 16 town hall debate.&quot;</blockquote> The rule is only that the audience be so instructed. I heard Candy Crowley do that (check the transcript).
that guy.
i was just listening to the debate on the radio but knew within three words that he was a bagging tool. something about that shaggy frat boy way of speaking.
You&#039;re saying you don&#039;t like America&#039;s favorite car alarm salesman, arsonist, and military-service prevaricator?
Me either.
You suppose anyone&#039;s ever fapped to Jennifer&#039;s picture?
Just seeing her on teevee (they confine her to the weekend-morning nerd ghetto for public safety reasons) produces major soft-offs across the nation.
Behold: <a href="http://www.commentarymagazi..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/wp-content/uplo...">http://www.commentarymagazi...
<i>&quot;it would have been only fair if Tagg Romney had been allowed to punch Obama in the face.&quot;</i>
I&#039;ll grant that Mister T ultimately restrained himself. But consider his impulse to violence. And also consider that his father -- the Mitt -- complained about his sons&#039; constant lying* at the last debate. I can only conclude T and the boys were raised by some single-mother-crack-whore-welfare-queen. Or a gay couple. ________________________________________ * ROMNEY: <i>&ldquo;Look, I&rsquo;ve got five boys I&rsquo;m used to people saying something that&rsquo;s not always true but just keep repeating it and ultimately hoping I&rsquo;ll believe it.&quot;</i> The apples don&#039;t fall far from the tree.
You&#39;re welcome!
Not for nuthin, but the debate rules Romney agreed to said the candidates couldn&#039;t question each other. I&#039;m just going to assume there is also outrage in wing-world about R-bot&#039;s flagrant flaunting of that rule.
(He wanted to be like Dirty Harry: &quot;I know what you&#039;re thinking. Did you issue five drilling permits or six? To be honest, I lost count. So, do you fell lucky punk?&quot; But it came off as rude or demented.
Clap on. Clap off.
She&#039;s not clapping. She&#039;s self-terrorist-fist-bumping. Which is not against the rules. (I checked.)