151 Comments

I'm pretty sure that it used to be true but I think it changed a long time ago (early 90s, maybe?).

Expand full comment

It really is like shooting fish in a barrel for her ad writers, isn't it?

Expand full comment

Still too soon to joke about. :(

Expand full comment

Nope, it stands for "Jerk." True story.

Expand full comment

If he's elected, the Constitution will mean as much as his word or his signature on a contract does.

Expand full comment

Like everything else they do, lol. But then they'll just blame it on Democrats. "Oh, that bill that Obama vetoed? Still his fault."

Expand full comment

chortlingdingo/shannanigans 2024!

(Remove that slash and it sounds like one insane Saturday night)

Expand full comment

Yes! So true. When this bill comes back to bite us in the butt, they'll simply put on their amnesia caps and blame the Dems. And they'll also pretend that whatever consequences come down the line wasn't as a result of this bill. They'll pretend they're surprised and become indignant at civilians of other nations suing us.

Expand full comment

We're also fortunate Hitler was not a military strategist or we'd be goose-stepping down Main Straße.

Expand full comment

Allegedly!

Expand full comment

LA Times has an article about lawsuit against Trump 'cause he only wanted the pretty girls working at his golf clubs.

http://www.latimes.com/proj...

Expand full comment

And that's manifesting itself in the polls. Hillary is back up to a 70% win chance in 538's nowcast.

Expand full comment

Allowing US citizens to sue Saudi Arabia sets a precedent. Now the families of people droned by the US can sue America. I'm almost certain that's not what the Rebs had in mind.

Expand full comment

That was vicious. No wonder Trump can't shut up.

Expand full comment

That's why our German friend is panicking.She can't believe it.

Expand full comment

They're the auto-abortin' vaginas that seek welfare all the time

Expand full comment