290 Comments
User's avatar
feckless's avatar

Remember when tRump was in a nationally televised debate, he invited Russia to steal Hillary's email.They did.And tRump accepted the stolen emails.How is that not collusion?Am I missing something?Why is this NEVER mentioned?

Jensie's avatar

So the WSJ is the Facebook (sorry, Meta) of the print world

2plus2's avatar

And WSJ titles the article "President T***...." instead of TFG, how respectful. They've licked the boots clean and are headed north.

Chuck Dickens's avatar

Is Steve Bannon in jail?

revenant's avatar

another Murdoch property that needs to be burned to the ground

Enter Ranting's avatar

Deport the Murdoch family.

Aileen's avatar

Exactly. Who's to say if their efforts actually swung the election since Russia's primary contribution was a targeted propaganda campaign which is nearly impossible to measure the results of, but it seems pretty obvious the collusion was happening.

Monkfish MILKTOAST Apologist's avatar

The Russian collusion claims have not been proven false, in fact they need to be re-examined. There is no statute of limitations on sedition.

runfastandwin's avatar

WSJ? GRAVITAS? Surely you jest…

Brian Bixby's avatar

Actually the Democratic emails came from someone working for the party with valid access to the server, it wasn't even hacking. Just data theft (still illegal).

Brian Bixby's avatar

Their owner's order. Unlike Bezos there has never been any sign of the Murdoch family keeping its hands out of editorial decisions.

Furiouser and furiouser's avatar

Is it Jake Tapper or Chris Wallace or both of them that refuse to allow members of Congress who voted against certifying the electors on their shows? Whichever one it is said they didn’t want to be part of spreading lies. Pretty simple tenet of journalism, really.

Cliff Hendroval's avatar

If I had a time machine back into the early 20th century and was given the assignment of making sure a certain person's parents never met, Old Rupe would be at the top of the list.