68 Comments

It's not easy getting drunk with their weak-ass product.

Expand full comment

DB, go to the home page and scroll down a bit. This was covered (exhaustively) on Thursday!

Expand full comment

Does Pat Robertson's closet have a light in there? Sure sounds like he ain't getting a lot of reading done in there, Cowboy...

http://media.giphy.com/medi...

Expand full comment

I thought we were a vile angry snark mob? I can't keep up with all the slogan changes.

Expand full comment

The first time this story arrived on Wonkette, I think we went around this discussion before. I, like many, were skeptical that this was hubby's first ever time. Amid all the born-agin hypocrisy, it seems dubious but it is possible that this, with alcohol added to the mix, is a one-off deal.

My objection then and now is that Pat Robertson, the worst person in the universe to consult about any life problem, hauls out his old boys-will-be-boys routine. My husband cheats with another woman? Boys will be boys. My husband cheats with another man. Boys will be boys. For such a routinely judgmental guy, you have to wonder how often this old boy has been a boy. At least since he was doing the booze run from Japan, I figure. If hubby raped an alpaca, I'm confident that Pat would trot out his old boys will be boys routine and tell her to grit her teeth and enjoy it.

Of course, if the shoe were on the other foot, an unfaithful wife wouldn't get the benefit of that whoppingly nonsensical doubt.

And, as I remarked before, the Lederer sisters and their successors would have told the wife to protect her health and the health of everyone else in the epidemiological chain. But that would involve science and Pat is not a scientist. He's a grifter.

EDIT: I think in the previous discussion we also chewed over his distinction about whether cheating hubby was a habitual drunk or a habitual teh geh. We generally agreed that this is just another bullshit argument and leads up to his boys will be boys excuse. You can be perfectly sure that he would not entertain for a minute the idea that sexual attraction exists across a a continuum, except when asserting the boys will be boys defense.

Expand full comment

You can get away with anything if you are non-habitual a male drunk, non-habitual teh geh. Just be sure you are swinging a dick. Otherwise, you are a Jezebel of the worst stripe.

Expand full comment

I mean, it's to the point where Americans can't show their faces anywhere because of that dickwad.

This wasn't the case already, because of W?

Expand full comment

Item #3: Pomeranian libel!

Expand full comment

or....Suck, Pat, suck. "Blow' is just a figure of speech!

Expand full comment

You know what they say about practicing homosexuals, they keep doing it until they get it right. Or, in Pat's case, rightwing. Either way.

Expand full comment

... after the SCOTUS rules they way they should, yes.

Expand full comment

... and have mercy on your soul. This is what happens when pleasures become guilty ones.

Expand full comment

... the Conservative Projector occupies a land mass at least half the size of the U.S.A. And it takes an almost unlimited amount of derp energy to power it it.

Expand full comment

... there really is no end to the fucking over of the poorz, is there? You know, it occurs to me that when you disenfranchise people to the point where *they have nothing lose, and possibly something to gain* (like living to see another day)... you really shouldn't be surprised when the already tattered fabric of society is ripped asunder.

Expand full comment

Ahh Pat...

Expand full comment

It's just a Doge, (I'll leave the rest of the meme out...)

Expand full comment